Sujet : Re: Better cheaper super capacitors
De : jlarkin_highland_tech (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 08. Sep 2024, 16:41:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <j5hrdjd6jnctnbfenh074cgjjfe0koq5k4@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 07:34:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <
alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:45:22 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <stsodj1etjq4bnfbea9gqlbeefbf40p4pr@4ax.com>:
>
On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 05:24:50 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
Achieving a supercapacitor through the 'molecular coating' approach
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240905121043.htm
>
I doubt that supercaps will ever achieve the energy density of
batteries, and if they get close they will be equally explosive.
>
People are inventing super "capacitors" that sound awfully
electrochemical to me.
>
The threshold for a press release seems to be to make something that
will light an LED, which takes about a microwatt.
>
Yes, new batteries are invented every week it seems.
Now super capacitors too
We will have to wait for it to be in the shops.
>
Methane has half the carbon of a long-chain liquid hydrocarbon. In
most situations, a 2:1 improvement is considered to be pretty good.
CNG cars work. But the greenies hate methane. As they hate nukes and
hydro power.
They hate energy.