Sujet : Re: OT: Biden & Harris would rather you didn't see this....
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 10. Sep 2024, 06:05:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbok31$2pfl3$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/09/2024 7:44 am, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 17:37:49 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 14:25:10 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 16:40:16 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
On Mon, 09 Sep 2024 12:28:01 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 14:32:49 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 9/09/2024 9:37 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
< https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cant-take-it-anymore-residents-springfield-ohio-beg-help-after-20000-haitians-overwhelm>
>
A second Trump presidency can't come soon enough!
>
Zerohedge exists to post fatuous right-wing political propaganda, to
which Cursitor Doom is addicted - it does have to be truly fatuous to
whet his appetite.
>
NPR reports basically the same story. The roughly 20K Haitian
immigrants are real.
>
Yes.
>
.<https://www.foxnews.com/video/6357715590112>
>
.<https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/thousands-of-haitian-immigrants-now-in-springfield-5-takeaways-from-our-reporting/QQFDZR6JAVCBNC6TGZGAEKE2JU/>
>
Basically the mayor of Springfield said that these costs could cause
the city of Springfield to fail and go bankrupt, which certainly makes
sense: A city of ~60,000 people is suddenly saddled with 20,000
indigent charity cases. And Springfield was poor to begin with -
classic rust belt story.
>
.<https://www.mass.gov/news/governor-healey-declares-state-of-emergency-calls-for-support-for-newly-arriving-migrant-families>
>
Joe Gwinn
>
Immigration should be controlled. Immigrants should be individually
sponsored and helped and dispersed.
>
Sloman doesn't have to read or think. If it's a link from Zero Hedge
or Brietbart or WattsUp, he knows it's false. That saves his valuable
time.
>
Why respond to him at all? It's pointless.
Particularly when the responses are a feeble as the one John Larkin produces.
If he talks about something that's arguably on topic, it helps keep
the group alive. But since he doesn't, I guess I'll go back to
ignoring him for a couple of years.
If only you would.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
OT: Biden & Harris would rather you didn't see this....
Re: OT: Biden & Harris would rather you didn't see this....