Sujet : Re: Better cheaper super capacitors
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 10. Sep 2024, 20:48:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbq7qp$333ks$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:45:22 -0700, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 05:24:50 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
Achieving a supercapacitor through the 'molecular coating' approach
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240905121043.htm
I doubt that supercaps will ever achieve the energy density of
batteries, and if they get close they will be equally explosive.
People are inventing super "capacitors" that sound awfully
electrochemical to me.
The threshold for a press release seems to be to make something that
will light an LED, which takes about a microwatt.
Absent some revolutionary new technology, I suspect you may be right. Mind
you, we have people who are quite happy to only be able to drive for only
200 miles in an EV and wait several hours between re-charges. And suffer a
*massive* deprecation on their 2nd biggest asset. *And* pay a fortune to
have their old battery recycled. Fuggin' idiots.
Better cheaper super capacitors
Re: Better cheaper super capacitors