Sujet : Re: Cooling a TO-220 7812 regulator
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 15. Sep 2024, 20:56:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <6qeeejt3r1siler3evrfl17jct91fu5r7s@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 01:11:45 +0530, Pimpom <
Pimpom@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
On 16-09-2024 12:25 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:03:09 +0530, Pimpom <Pimpom@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
>
Thanks for the input. Calculating heatsink requirement for continuous
dissipation is one thing. Short bursts are another.
You can estimate the mass and specific heat of a fet and do the math.
It's even easier to test one. You could do that quickly.
Given a TO-220 gadget, it would be nice to know the temp rise per
joule dumped into it. Maybe I'll measure that.
First google hit:
https://www.avrfreaks.net/s/topic/a5C3l000000UNfNEAW/t104767
"A TO-220 package has a thermal capacitance of 0.54(J/C) and thermal
resistance of about 62(C/W) without a heatsink."
Based on that, 4 watts for 1 second works out to about 8C rise. The
PCB will help a little.
That's good to know. Even if those data are a bit off, it still leaves
plenty of headroom for a safe operation including hotspots on the chip.
>
BTW I think it was you who mentioned Saturn PCB Toolkit in a thread
several years ago. I've been using it since then. It's a useful tool.
>
There was a time when they seemed to have blocked downloads from outside
the US. They didn't actually say so and it took me some time to figure
it out. I managed to get around that with a VPN. I'm using v8.39 now.
Saturn is great, but the current version defaults to a hideous color
scheme, which fortunately can be fixed.