Re: another hint of quantum consciousness

On 16/09/2024 1:45 am, john larkin wrote:

On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:37:54 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
 

On 15/09/2024 7:24 pm, Jeroen Belleman wrote:

On 9/15/24 04:18, john larkin wrote:

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:28:44 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 9/14/24 21:02, john larkin wrote:

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:38:14 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:33:37 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 13:03:07 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>

On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:13:10 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

<snip>

As for quantum biology, biology is complicated chemistry and
chemistry is a complicated consequence of quantum mechanics.
It's just a different level of abstraction. I don't suppose you
use quantum theory to design an opamp circuit, do you?

>
Phil Hobbs has to work around quite a lot of Johnson noise, which is the
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in action. John Larkin performs at a
less demanding level.

 What's amazing about Johnson noise is that some resistors don't have
it.

Which ones? Resistors sunk in boiling liquid helium don't have much, but they have some. Your lack of thermodynamic sophistication is showing.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney