Sujet : Re: Exploding pagers
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 19. Sep 2024, 14:53:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vchach$j8d7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 19/09/2024 11:27 pm, Joe Gwinn wrote:
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:23:10 +0200, "Carlos E.R."
<robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-09-18 22:32, Joe Gwinn wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:01:07 +0200, "Carlos E.R."
<robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>
On 2024-09-18 01:32, john larkin wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:03:45 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 9/17/2024 6:39 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:18:26 -0500, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>
wrote:
<snip>
There is a repeating pattern here:
We have two countries, A and B, at war with one another.
Country A uses weapons of low accuracy, killing mostly civilians plus
a few unlucky military.
Country B uses weapons of high accuracy, killing mostly military plus
a few unlucky civilians.
Which is better, and why?
Not a relevant question in this context. Israel may be using some weapons of high accuracy, but what they are mostly using are heavy weapons which kill a lot more civilians (and children) than the military they were presumably aimed at.
If lots of civilians end up dead anyway, the "accuracy" of the weapons is of largely academic interest.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Exploding pagers
Re: Exploding pagers