Re: OT: Chinese tokamak

On 21/09/2024 12:53 am, john larkin wrote:

On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 04:49:24 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
 

On a sunny day (Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:00:24 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jl@650pot.com> wrote in <ddioej5a4ub2ie5fh6ib2hlgbopthlkm8m@4ax.com>:
>

On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:50:40 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>

On a sunny day (Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:41:35 -0700) it happened john larkin
<JL@gct.com> wrote in <4udoejpkbsslc7jtm8864p1e6aqj1g0u4u@4ax.com>:
>

On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:49:30 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>

The US led on nuclear fusion for decades.
Now China is in position to win the race:
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/19/climate/nuclear-fusion-clean-energy-china-us/index.html
>
China's EAST tokamak in Hefei held plasma stable at 70 million degrees Celsius
- five times hotter than the core of the sun - for more than 17 minutes,
a world record and an objectively astonishing breakthrough.

>
Sounds expensive and useless, like the Chinese moon landings.

>
>

Feed the kids first.

>
Once they have Mars they will ask for you 'merrican tourists to pay in Chinese currency and feed their kids
in the Martian settlements with stuff they import from Russia.
By that time chances are likely 'merrica's You Ash of AAAAh will no longer be,...
just a few settlements...grasshuts, wigwams, greens ruling.
>
China is not doing bad feeding and housing their people,
US homelesness and poverty is
https://www2.cbn.com/news/us/china-moves-dominate-world-food-supply-food-power

>
The real concept there is not "food", it's "dominate."
>
https://www.wfp.org/countries/china
>
Communism always evolves to rule by psychopathic thugs.

>
Well, I guess .. lemme see,
demoncrazy is like stepping into a bar and asking the people there to design a <you name it>

 That's not a bad idea if the bar is full of EEs, which some are. We
had a great brainstorm session yesterday, but I forgot to bring beer.
 

>
>

A lot of the US homeless problem is caused by Chinese drugs. By
design.

>
You talk crap, evade essential questions, not a good show Mr ? Lurkin!

 You are a Sloman clone. Switch discussions to insults.

Actually, that would make him a a Larkin clone. Except that John Larkin doesn't discuss, he merely pontificates, and feels hurt when his pontifications are questioned (which is what discussion is all about).

That's easy. Thinking is harder.

And John avoids it like the plague, always assuming that he could do it in the first place.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney