Re: power supply discharge

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: power supply discharge
De : erichpwagner (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (piglet)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 28. Sep 2024, 19:25:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vd9hnb$1c03b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:44:44 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
 
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:07:29 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
 
 
Given a benchtop power supply, you can turn the voltage up and then
down, and it goes down. Most have a substantial amount of output
capacitance, and can be driving an external cap too. So something
pulls the output down.
 
I guess that there are no standards for this, but I've never seen a
supply that just hangs high when it's cranked down.
 
I'm designing some programmable multi-channel power suplies and that
is one of many tangled issues in the project.
 
Twiddling the adjustment knob on a bench supply doesn't
represent a dramatic change - and most adjustible
supplies don't load their output terminals with a
lot of capacitance.
 
I've measured a few, and got output terminal capacitance of a few
hundred to maybe 2000 uF.
 
People here might measure some random power supplies. I leave them off
and connect to a 50 ohm sinewave-output function generator and find
the -3 dB point. One could use a square wave and scope the slopes too.
Keeping the amplitude low will avoid turning semi junctions on.
 
A square wave source driving a cap illustrates C, ESR, and ESL on a
scope. C-meters don't usually separate the components so trend to lie,
especially with big electrolytics.
 
 
DC coupled programable supplies, or bipolar programmable
supplies are made to drive loads in the first and third
quadrants.
 
There are issues in the second and fourth quadrants, where
the supply is expected to absorb power.
 
An amplifier driving a pure reactance experiences the same
losses as driving a dead short.
 
I don't understand that. An audio amp driving a 1  pF cap or a 1K
henry inductor would surely cause less amp losses than a short.
 
 

Good bench power supplies should have minimal built in output capacitance;
it compromises current limit performance. Anyone wanting supply decoupling
caps on their test load is going to have them already at the load side
anyhow.

I am a fan of the HP / Harrison Labs supplies of 1960s that have no output
caps and are stable.

--
piglet

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Sep 24 * power supply discharge69john larkin
27 Sep 24 +* Re: power supply discharge12Liz Tuddenham
27 Sep 24 i`* Re: power supply discharge11john larkin
27 Sep 24 i +- Re: power supply discharge1Liz Tuddenham
28 Sep 24 i +- Re: power supply discharge1Bill Sloman
28 Sep 24 i +* Re: power supply discharge5legg
28 Sep 24 i i`* Re: power supply discharge4john larkin
28 Sep 24 i i +- Re: power supply discharge1Bill Sloman
30 Sep 24 i i +- Re: power supply discharge1legg
30 Sep 24 i i `- Re: power supply discharge1legg
6 Oct 24 i `* Re: power supply discharge3Clive Arthur
6 Oct 24 i  +- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin
9 Oct 24 i  `- Re: power supply discharge1Bill Sloman
27 Sep 24 +* Re: power supply discharge7Sylvia Else
27 Sep 24 i`* Re: power supply discharge6john larkin
27 Sep 24 i +* Re: power supply discharge2Phil Hobbs
28 Sep 24 i i`- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin
28 Sep 24 i `* Re: power supply discharge3Sylvia Else
28 Sep 24 i  `* Re: power supply discharge2john larkin
28 Sep 24 i   `- Re: power supply discharge1Bill Sloman
28 Sep 24 +* Re: power supply discharge16legg
28 Sep 24 i+* Re: power supply discharge13john larkin
28 Sep 24 ii+* Re: power supply discharge3piglet
29 Sep 24 iii+- Re: power supply discharge1legg
29 Sep 24 iii`- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin
29 Sep 24 ii+- Re: power supply discharge1legg
29 Sep 24 ii`* Re: power supply discharge8john larkin
30 Sep 24 ii `* Re: power supply discharge7Sylvia Else
30 Sep 24 ii  `* Re: power supply discharge6john larkin
1 Oct 24 ii   `* Re: power supply discharge5Jan Panteltje
1 Oct 24 ii    `* Re: power supply discharge4john larkin
2 Oct 24 ii     +- Re: power supply discharge1Jan Panteltje
2 Oct 24 ii     `* Re: power supply discharge2legg
12 Oct 24 ii      `- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin
28 Sep 24 i`* Re: power supply discharge2KevinJ93
29 Sep 24 i `- Re: power supply discharge1legg
28 Sep 24 +* Re: power supply discharge2Clive Arthur
28 Sep 24 i`- Re: power supply discharge1Jan Panteltje
29 Sep 24 `* Re: power supply discharge31Joerg
29 Sep 24  `* Re: power supply discharge30john larkin
30 Sep 24   +* Re: power supply discharge26legg
30 Sep 24   i`* Re: power supply discharge25john larkin
30 Sep 24   i +* Re: power supply discharge23Joerg
1 Oct 24   i i`* Re: power supply discharge22john larkin
1 Oct 24   i i `* Re: power supply discharge21Joe Gwinn
1 Oct 24   i i  +* Re: power supply discharge19john larkin
1 Oct 24   i i  i`* Re: power supply discharge18Joe Gwinn
1 Oct 24   i i  i +* Re: power supply discharge4john larkin
1 Oct 24   i i  i i+- Re: power supply discharge1Joe Gwinn
2 Oct 24   i i  i i`* Re: power supply discharge2ehsjr
3 Oct 24   i i  i i `- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin
9 Oct 24   i i  i `* Re: power supply discharge13john larkin
9 Oct 24   i i  i  +* Re: power supply discharge4ehsjr
9 Oct 24   i i  i  i`* Re: power supply discharge3john larkin
10 Oct 24   i i  i  i `* Re: power supply discharge2ehsjr
11 Oct 24   i i  i  i  `- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin
9 Oct 24   i i  i  `* Re: power supply discharge8Joe Gwinn
9 Oct 24   i i  i   `* Re: power supply discharge7john larkin
9 Oct 24   i i  i    `* Re: power supply discharge6Joe Gwinn
9 Oct 24   i i  i     `* Re: power supply discharge5john larkin
11 Oct 24   i i  i      `* Re: power supply discharge4Joe Gwinn
11 Oct 24   i i  i       `* Re: power supply discharge3john larkin
11 Oct 24   i i  i        `* Re: power supply discharge [OT]2Liz Tuddenham
11 Oct 24   i i  i         `- Re: power supply discharge [OT]1john larkin
2 Oct 24   i i  `- Re: power supply discharge1Jan Panteltje
2 Oct 24   i `- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin
2 Oct 24   +- Re: power supply discharge1Liz Tuddenham
2 Oct 24   `* Re: power supply discharge2john larkin
3 Oct 24    `- Re: power supply discharge1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal