Re: RF Metrology

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: RF Metrology
De : jeroen (at) *nospam* nospam.please (Jeroen Belleman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 29. Sep 2024, 19:02:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdc4gn$1r4te$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
On 9/29/24 19:14, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Greetings, gentlemen,
 I bought one of those TinySA Ultras recently and have spent some time
testing it today. I have to say it's amazing what they've done for the
price. I mean, truly amazing. I do have two other 'proper' lab-grade
RF spectrum analyzers, but I think I'm going to be mostly using the
TinySA in future as it's just *so* convenient and doesn't weigh a ton.
Anyway, to get back to the point of this post, having checked out the
TSA and establishing I didn't buy one of the fake versions that are
out there, I turned my attention to my mid-level RF SA, an HP who's
model number escapes me (not the 8566B I've posted here about before
which is now fully working, but a newer model that's about 1/3 as
heavy. I say I can't recall the model number but it's not relevant to
this question anyway. "So what is the fucking question, CD??" I hear
you not unreasonably cry. Well, it's this:
When I'm feeding an RF signal into the SA, I'm seeing differing
amplitudes at different frequencies. So I've programmed in a sweep
from 10Mhz to 5.4Ghz at -49dBm using my Aeroflex RF signal generator
and I'm seeing the displayed amplitude vary as it sweeps through the
range. But this only happens when I'm using a cheap, Chinese N-type to
SMA adaptor at the signal generator output. Would I be right to
suspect some imperfection in the manufacturing of the adaptor could
cause such an effect? I do have a VNA I could characterize the adaptor
with but it's a bit of an effort to do. It would seem like the SA is
showing the adaptor's shortcomings in the frequency domain. But is
that a feasible hypothesis?
 Your pal,
 CD.
Aren't we getting a teensy bit lazy?
Jeroen Belleman

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Sep 24 * RF Metrology21Cursitor Doom
29 Sep 24 +- Re: RF Metrology1Phil Hobbs
29 Sep 24 +- Re: RF Metrology1john larkin
29 Sep 24 +* Re: RF Metrology9Jeroen Belleman
29 Sep 24 i`* Re: RF Metrology8John R Walliker
29 Sep 24 i +* Re: RF Metrology5Cursitor Doom
29 Sep 24 i i`* Re: RF Metrology4john larkin
29 Sep 24 i i +* Re: RF Metrology2Cursitor Doom
30 Sep 24 i i i`- Re: RF Metrology1Jan Panteltje
30 Sep 24 i i `- Re: RF Metrology1Robert Roland
29 Sep 24 i `* Re: RF Metrology2Jeroen Belleman
29 Sep 24 i  `- Re: RF Metrology1john larkin
30 Sep 24 +* Re: RF Metrology2Jan Panteltje
30 Sep 24 i`- Re: RF Metrology1Cursitor Doom
6 Oct 24 `* Re: RF Metrology7Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
6 Oct 24  +- Re: RF Metrology1Cursitor Doom
6 Oct 24  `* Re: RF Metrology5john larkin
6 Oct 24   `* Re: RF Metrology4Jeroen Belleman
7 Oct 24    +- Re: RF Metrology1john larkin
8 Oct 24    `* Re: RF Metrology2legg
8 Oct 24     `- Re: RF Metrology1Jeroen Belleman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal