Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
"Arie de Muijnck" <noreply@ademu.nl> wrote in message news:nnd$7f138845$4f992b3a@6f6ac280155cacc4...Way too complex. A series resistor between TL431 and optocoupler was all that was needed.On 2024-10-02 20:02, Edward Rawde wrote:A seperate smaller schottky and capacitor for just the TLV431 seems to work fine in the LTC4267 simulation I just did and works"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vdjvmh$3aipj$1@dont-email.me...>On 10/2/2024 8:46 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:>I did PoE with LTC4267 some years ago such that 12V could also be supplied from a wart.>
Fully isolated with a PA1138 transformer.
How did you inform the PD of the fact that it was no longer
dependant on (and controllable by) the PSE? Or, did you forego
in-band reconfiguration and power control?
It wasn't necessary for the fairly specialized product which was configured at install time with power from PoE or wart but not
both.
I seem to recall at least one accidental connection of both with no detrimental effect but it wasn't investigated further.
>
I've seen a problem when the PoE module had a TL431 + optocoupler at it's output as feedback circuit.
A limiting resistor was lacking, and +12.3V from a wart turned the TL431 fully on and destroyed the optocoupler.
Subsequent PoE operation then had an open loop and destroyed the supplied circuit.
around wall wart power getting connected to the TLV431.
To disconnect wart power when PoE is operating, put a low power voltage doubler on the transformer secondary and use the 24V to
swich off a p-fet in series with wart power.
>
Arie
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.