Sujet : Re: OT: Why the Left wants to ban/imprison/kill contrarians
De : joegwinn (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Joe Gwinn)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 09. Oct 2024, 19:01:11
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <b1gdgjtf3hlt02otebpj40euh69dmpkc6g@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 21:48:23 -0700, John Robertson <
jrr@flippers.com>
wrote:
On 2024-10-06 4:53 p.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
Hillary wants all opposing views censored, so the First Amendment has
to go!
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hillary-clinton-desperation-warns-well-lose-total-control-if-social-media-stops-censoring
>
Stop drinking the Kool-Aid!
Well, Zerohedge tends to be hair afire and imprecise on details, so I
followed the breadcrumb trail to the actual video of the WEF (Davos)
"Defending Truth" forum. Here is a closer link from ZH's page:
.<
https://modernity.news/2024/01/19/wsj-editor-in-chief-tells-davos-elites-we-no-longer-own-the-news/>
The video is 45 minutes long, and worth watching from the start. The
key exchange about we being the keeper of truth (at about 8 minutes
in) was said by Emma Tucker (editor-in-chief of the WSJ) in response
to Meredith Kopit Levien (editor-in-chief of the NYT), and the "we"
was Meredith and Emma, not Emma alone. Given that the NYT and the WST
are by far the largest print media organization in North America, both
being papers-of-record, this is literally true.
Joe Gwinn