Re: EMC compliance question

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: EMC compliance question
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 11. Oct 2024, 01:52:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ve9st1$3c1pj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/10/2024 2:58 am, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 13:25:04 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
 
On 10/10/2024 03:21, john larkin wrote:
>
<snip CE chat>
>
Do you really care?
>
My Brit friends say that CE means Can't Enforce.
>
Or Chinese Export.
>
They may say that, but I bet they comply - it means if your competitor
finds out that you don't comply you have problems.  I've never worked
anywhere where it's not taken seriously.
 In europe, "taking seriously" often means buying a reel of CE stickers
and slapping them on everything.
 Did you EMI lab test everything that you sold?
 We mostly sell things that go onto bigger systems, and our customer
worries about certifications. So we only need to not make them fail.
Our box could be buried deep inside their system.
 We only once were blamed for an important EMI failure, and that turned
out to be our customers fault.
 There must be ballpark a million shops in the USA that assemble PCs
from parts, mostly Chinese parts, the other CE kind, and I doubt if
1% of those assemblers do any EMI testing.
Just a little mindless optimism there.
I did get on product started on CE testing, and the mains connector was the weak point. I think the final solution was to buy a better one.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Oct 24 * EMC compliance question54bitrex
10 Oct 24 +* Re: EMC compliance question13john larkin
10 Oct 24 i`* Re: EMC compliance question12bitrex
10 Oct 24 i +* Re: EMC compliance question10john larkin
10 Oct 24 i i`* Re: EMC compliance question9Clive Arthur
10 Oct 24 i i +* Re: EMC compliance question4John R Walliker
10 Oct 24 i i i+- Re: EMC compliance question1bitrex
10 Oct 24 i i i+- Re: EMC compliance question1bitrex
10 Oct 24 i i i`- Re: EMC compliance question1john larkin
10 Oct 24 i i `* Re: EMC compliance question4john larkin
10 Oct 24 i i  +- Re: EMC compliance question1Clive Arthur
10 Oct 24 i i  +- Re: EMC compliance question1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
11 Oct 24 i i  `- Re: EMC compliance question1Bill Sloman
10 Oct 24 i `- Re: EMC compliance question1legg
10 Oct 24 `* Re: EMC compliance question40Don Y
10 Oct 24  `* Re: EMC compliance question39john larkin
11 Oct 24   +* Re: EMC compliance question12Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
11 Oct 24   i`* Re: EMC compliance question11john larkin
11 Oct 24   i +- Re: EMC compliance question1Phil Hobbs
12 Oct 24   i +- Re: EMC compliance question1Bill Sloman
12 Oct 24   i +- Re: EMC compliance question1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
12 Oct 24   i +* Re: EMC compliance question2Don Y
13 Oct 24   i i`- Re: EMC compliance question1Bill Sloman
13 Oct 24   i `* Re: EMC compliance question5legg
13 Oct 24   i  `* Re: EMC compliance question4Bill Sloman
14 Oct 24   i   `* Re: EMC compliance question3legg
14 Oct 24   i    `* Re: EMC compliance question2Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
14 Oct 24   i     `- Re: EMC compliance question1Don Y
12 Oct 24   `* Re: EMC compliance question26legg
12 Oct 24    +- Re: EMC compliance question1Don Y
12 Oct 24    `* Re: EMC compliance question24Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
12 Oct 24     +* Re: EMC compliance question8Don Y
13 Oct 24     i`* Re: EMC compliance question7Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
13 Oct 24     i +* Re: EMC compliance question3Don Y
13 Oct 24     i i`* Re: EMC compliance question2Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
13 Oct 24     i i `- Re: EMC compliance question1Don Y
13 Oct 24     i +- Re: EMC compliance question1john larkin
15 Oct 24     i +- Re: EMC compliance question1legg
15 Oct 24     i `- Re: EMC compliance question1legg
12 Oct 24     +* Re: EMC compliance question8john larkin
12 Oct 24     i+* Re: EMC compliance question6bitrex
12 Oct 24     ii`* Re: EMC compliance question5john larkin
13 Oct 24     ii `* Re: EMC compliance question4John R Walliker
13 Oct 24     ii  +- Re: EMC compliance question1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
13 Oct 24     ii  `* Re: EMC compliance question2john larkin
13 Oct 24     ii   `- Re: EMC compliance question1Bill Sloman
13 Oct 24     i`- Re: EMC compliance question1Bill Sloman
12 Oct 24     `* Re: EMC compliance question7Joe Gwinn
12 Oct 24      +* Re: EMC compliance question3john larkin
13 Oct 24      i`* Re: EMC compliance question2Joe Gwinn
13 Oct 24      i `- Re: EMC compliance question1Jan Panteltje
13 Oct 24      `* Re: EMC compliance question3legg
13 Oct 24       `* Re: EMC compliance question2Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
13 Oct 24        `- Re: EMC compliance question1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal