Re: oscillator gain

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: oscillator gain
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Oct 2024, 13:10:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf2rv2$dghu$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 20/10/2024 10:27 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:06:24 +0100, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
 
Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:05:08 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>
If the loop gain of an oscillator is slightly over 1.00, oscillations
gain amplitude. Just under 1.00, they die out.
>
Economies are like that.
>
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10/19/record-633000-business-
in-
britain-on-brink-of-collapse-report/
>
And the Communists have only been in government for around 2 months. It
doesn't take long for them to wreck everything!
>
Could Breitbart be biassed in some way ?
 No doubt. But I can't think of a single news source that isn't!
Breitbart, ZeroHedge and Fox News are predictably heavily biased to appeal to right-wing lunatics, of which Cursitor Doom is a depressingly rabid example.
He's so far gone that he thinks that main stream media is biased in favour of his imaginary Globalists.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Oct 24 * oscillator gain40john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain9Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
19 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain7Jan Panteltje
19 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain6john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   `* Re: oscillator gain5Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 i    `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i     `* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
20 Oct 24 i      `* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i       `- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
19 Oct 24 +* Re: oscillator gain25Cursitor Doom
19 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i+* Re: oscillator gain10Jan Panteltje
20 Oct 24 ii`* Re: oscillator gain9john larkin
20 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii +* Re: oscillator gain4Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 ii i`* Re: oscillator gain3john larkin
21 Oct 24 ii i `* Re: oscillator gain2Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 ii i  `- Re: oscillator gain1Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 ii `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i`* Re: oscillator gain12Liz Tuddenham
20 Oct 24 i +* Re: oscillator gain3Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i i+- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i i`- Re: oscillator gain1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i `* Re: oscillator gain8john larkin
20 Oct 24 i  +* Re: oscillator gain3Joe Gwinn
20 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i  i `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 i  `* Re: oscillator gain4john larkin
20 Oct 24 i   +* Re: oscillator gain2Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24 i   i`- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 i   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
20 Oct 24 `* Re: oscillator gain4Cursitor Doom
21 Oct 24  +- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24  `* Re: oscillator gain2john larkin
22 Oct 24   `- Re: oscillator gain1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal