Sujet : Re: oscillator gain
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 20. Oct 2024, 19:38:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf3ink$g5ng$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:06:35 -0400, Joe Gwinn wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:23:56 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:06:24 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>
Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:05:08 -0700, john larkin wrote:
If the loop gain of an oscillator is slightly over 1.00,
oscillations gain amplitude. Just under 1.00, they die out.
Economies are like that.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/10/19/record-633000-business-
in-
britain-on-brink-of-collapse-report/
And the Communists have only been in government for around 2 months.
It doesn't take long for them to wreck everything!
>
It usually takes a generation to really wreck things, although it has
been done a lot faster.
>
>
Could Breitbart be biassed in some way ?
>
Most news sources are horribly biased, essentially propaganda.
>
Real Clear at least links to both sides.
>
The New York Times seems to be getting a little bit more journalistic
lately. I hope that trend continues.
The big alternative to the NYT is the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), which
has been directly criticizing the NYT for their unbalanced coverage, and
is quite useful for pointing out what has been omitted. In the old
days, the NYT would be the check on the WSJ, and so on.
The WSJ has been owned by Rupert Murdoch for a while now IIRC, so it's not
surprising they're calling out the disgraceful NYT for its biased
coverage.