Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:25:33 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 10/20/2024 11:38 AM, john larkin wrote:On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:15:19 +0100, piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com>There's probably a way to finagle the 4th section of an LM13700 to apply
wrote:
Yesterday in the thread "Random thoughts on sinewave oscillators" I
posted a LT Spice wirelist showing amplitude levelling without fet,
ntc thermistor or ptc filament instead using current steering long
tail pair - kinda poor mans multiplier.
>
Here is another alternative, using diode conductance bridge
"variolosser".
>
For the full 1960s vibe replace U2 U3 with bjt current sources.
That's still limiting a Wein bridge, essentially a single-element
resonator.
If you do the double-integrator type oscillator, you can do gain
control on the first integrator, and then the second one adds 6
dB/octave harmonic reduction.
I think you can even get 12 dB/octave harmonic reduction if you do the
amplitude limiter right. 12*3 = 36!
a bias current inversely proportional to the output level into pin IB1,
here:
>
<https://imgur.com/a/xRVx2PC>
At some point, opamp distortion and slew rate will usually dominate THD.
I'd guess that the LM13700 isn't very good.
It might be OK as the small-influence AGC gain tweak, ahead of two good
integrating opamps.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.