Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 22. Oct 2024, 18:55:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <3ipfhjh3iimm7stfil32r16s81fvo1370h@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:24:36 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:27:24 -0400) it happened "Tom Del Rosso"
<fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote in
<vf5kss$v68q$2@dont-email.me>:
 
Jan Panteltje wrote:
>
And the old zig-zag symbols the US uses for resistors.....
--\/\/\/\/\--------
>
better
---====-----
  2k2
>
What's the point of that?
 
Looks better in big diagrams? (debatable I know)
Easier to draw by hand?
Takes less space?
 
 
Wasn't the zigzag used everywhere for 100 years?
 
That is no argument, so were petrol powered cars..
 
 
A rectangle could be anything.
 
Except in a drawn circuit with an R1234 type identifier
or some value next to it like 9k1.
>
But you then have to read the identifier before you know what the
component is.  The whole point of a symbol is that it is symbolic, so
you can scan over a circuit and see the general outlay without having to
read what every component is.

The wiggle thing is more obviously a resistor on a whiteboard.

More fun to draw too.

I had a medical event that, for some bizarre reason, wrecked the look
of my hand-drawn schematics. It was awful. It fixed itself in a month
or two.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Oct 24 * Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)101Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)95Jeroen Belleman
20 Oct 24 i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)94john larkin
20 Oct 24 i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)91Edward Rawde
20 Oct 24 i i+* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)83john larkin
20 Oct 24 i ii`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)82Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i ii `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)81john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)12Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 i ii  i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii  i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)10john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)6Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 i ii  i  i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3john larkin
23 Oct 24 i ii  i  i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Jan Panteltje
23 Oct 24 i ii  i  i    `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Clive Arthur
21 Oct 24 i ii  i   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 i ii  i   `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)12Lasse Langwadt
21 Oct 24 i ii  i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)8Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)7Cursitor Doom
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4john larkin
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii  i i i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i ii  i i i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii  i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Phil Hobbs
21 Oct 24 i ii  i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)56Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii   +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii   i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Tom Del Rosso
21 Oct 24 i ii   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)51Tom Del Rosso
21 Oct 24 i ii    +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii    i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii    i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Reinhard Zwirner
22 Oct 24 i ii    i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i ii    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)46Cursitor Doom
26 Oct 24 i ii     +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i ii     `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)44john larkin
26 Oct 24 i ii      `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)43Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii       `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)42john larkin
27 Oct 24 i ii        +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i ii        i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Liz Tuddenham
28 Oct 24 i ii        i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
28 Oct 24 i ii        i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i  `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
27 Oct 24 i ii        +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)34Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii        i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)33john larkin
27 Oct 24 i ii        i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii        i i+- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
27 Oct 24 i ii        i i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Phil Hobbs
28 Oct 24 i ii        i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)17Jan Panteltje
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)16john larkin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)15Jan Panteltje
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i  +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1wmartin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)13john larkin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11Jan Panteltje
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)6Liz Tuddenham
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Jan Panteltje
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Liz Tuddenham
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Jan Panteltje
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Liz Tuddenham
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i    `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3john larkin
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i     `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Jan Panteltje
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i      `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
16 Nov 24 i ii        i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)12Tom Del Rosso
16 Nov 24 i ii        i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11john larkin
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Phil Hobbs
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   i+* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   ii`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Phil Hobbs
18 Nov 24 i ii        i   ii `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1ehsjr
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Cursitor Doom
16 Nov 24 i ii        i    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4john larkin
16 Nov 24 i ii        i     `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
17 Nov 24 i ii        i      `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
17 Nov 24 i ii        i       `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Cursitor Doom
28 Oct 24 i ii        `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Phil Hobbs
17 Nov 24 i ii         `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)7piglet
21 Oct 24 i i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)6Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 i i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5john larkin
21 Oct 24 i i   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
26 Oct 24 i i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
26 Oct 24 i i    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
27 Oct 24 i i     `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Clive Arthur
21 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
20 Oct 24 +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
20 Oct 24 +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
21 Oct 24 i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Tom Del Rosso

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal