Re: squeezing a field

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: squeezing a field
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 23. Oct 2024, 19:33:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <u4gihjdgcgi1nc60s64g7pts22fm2h303m@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:14:57 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
I'm designing a small PCB with essentially 5 sync buck switching
regulators. Board space is tight so I want to put the inductors on the
bottom of the multilayer board. There's a 0.2" gap between the bottom
of the board and a big aluminum flange.
 
Unshielded drum cores have the most energy storage per volume or
dollars. They store energy in the universe instead of in ferrite. Good
cooling too.
 
Something like this just fits
 
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/bourns-inc/SRN8040TA-470M/6155133
 
Its mag field lines will bounce off the PCB planes and the flange,
change from the classic bar magnet pattern into a pancake . I wonder
what that will do to its electrical behavior.
 
 
 
>
Not a whole lot.  In the near-field region, B obeys Laplace’s equation,
which means among other things that the field falls off on the length scale
of the gap, not of the whole inductor.
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs

You are right. A similar part is 47 uH in free air, 44.6 mounted on a
multilayer board, and 42.1 squeezed between the board and a big chunk
of aluminum.

So it will work.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Oct 24 * squeezing a field41john larkin
23 Oct 24 +* Re: squeezing a field37Phil Hobbs
23 Oct 24 i`* Re: squeezing a field36john larkin
24 Oct 24 i +* Re: squeezing a field33Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i i`* Re: squeezing a field32Lasse Langwadt
24 Oct 24 i i +* Re: squeezing a field30john larkin
24 Oct 24 i i i`* Re: squeezing a field29Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i +* Re: squeezing a field17john larkin
25 Oct 24 i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field16Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field13Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field12Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field10john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i+- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field8Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field6Phil Hobbs
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field5Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i `* Re: squeezing a field4Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field3Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   +- Re: squeezing a field1Dennis
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   `- Re: squeezing a field1Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i +- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1legg
25 Oct 24 i i i `* Re: squeezing a field11Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  +* Re: squeezing a field4Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i  i`* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  i +- Re: squeezing a field1John R Walliker
25 Oct 24 i i i  i `- Re: squeezing a field1Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field6legg
27 Oct 24 i i i   `* Re: squeezing a field5Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i i i    `* Re: squeezing a field4legg
28 Oct 24 i i i     `* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
28 Oct 24 i i i      `* Re: squeezing a field2piglet
28 Oct 24 i i i       `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: squeezing a field2legg
24 Oct 24 i  `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
27 Oct 24 `* Re: squeezing a field3Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
27 Oct 24  `* Re: squeezing a field2john larkin
31 Oct 24   `- Re: squeezing a field1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal