Re: squeezing a field

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: squeezing a field
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Oct 2024, 18:42:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <jg1lhjd9r39i6ppcr050f7u52cek1ftosp@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 18:45:20 +0200, Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk>
wrote:

On 10/24/24 12:07, Bill Sloman wrote:
On 24/10/2024 5:33 am, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:14:57 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
I'm designing a small PCB with essentially 5 sync buck switching
regulators. Board space is tight so I want to put the inductors on the
bottom of the multilayer board. There's a 0.2" gap between the bottom
of the board and a big aluminum flange.
>
Unshielded drum cores have the most energy storage per volume or
dollars. They store energy in the universe instead of in ferrite. Good
cooling too.
>
Something like this just fits
>
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/bourns-inc/SRN8040TA-470M/6155133
>
Its mag field lines will bounce off the PCB planes and the flange,
change from the classic bar magnet pattern into a pancake . I wonder
what that will do to its electrical behavior.
>
>
>
>
Not a whole lot.  In the near-field region, B obeys Laplace’s equation,
which means among other things that the field falls off on the length
scale
of the gap, not of the whole inductor.
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs
>
You are right. A similar part is 47 uH in free air, 44.6 mounted on a
multilayer board, and 42.1 squeezed between the board and a big chunk
of aluminum.
>
So it will work.
 
Somebody who knew what they were doing could model it in LTSpice. The
adjacent metal-work is a poorly coupled shorted turn. Model your
inductor as 47uH coil with 0.135 series resistance and 4pF of parallel
capacitance, and model the metal as a coupled - perhaps 1nH single turn
- with perhaps 1% coupling and maybe a milliohm of resistance.
>
plugging numbers pulled out of thin air into LTSpice is better that
doing the actual measurement?
>
>
>
>

It is for people who don't actually work with real parts.

I wouldn't know how to use Spice to model mag field coupling into PCB
copper planes, or into a big hunk of aluminum. And it's good to get
away from a screen and do something real now and then. Drill holes,
dremel, solder, measure, things like that.




Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Oct 24 * squeezing a field41john larkin
23 Oct 24 +* Re: squeezing a field37Phil Hobbs
23 Oct 24 i`* Re: squeezing a field36john larkin
24 Oct 24 i +* Re: squeezing a field33Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i i`* Re: squeezing a field32Lasse Langwadt
24 Oct 24 i i +* Re: squeezing a field30john larkin
24 Oct 24 i i i`* Re: squeezing a field29Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i +* Re: squeezing a field17john larkin
25 Oct 24 i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field16Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field13Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field12Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field10john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i+- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field8Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field6Phil Hobbs
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field5Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i `* Re: squeezing a field4Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field3Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   +- Re: squeezing a field1Dennis
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   `- Re: squeezing a field1Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i +- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1legg
25 Oct 24 i i i `* Re: squeezing a field11Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  +* Re: squeezing a field4Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i  i`* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  i +- Re: squeezing a field1John R Walliker
25 Oct 24 i i i  i `- Re: squeezing a field1Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field6legg
27 Oct 24 i i i   `* Re: squeezing a field5Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i i i    `* Re: squeezing a field4legg
28 Oct 24 i i i     `* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
28 Oct 24 i i i      `* Re: squeezing a field2piglet
28 Oct 24 i i i       `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: squeezing a field2legg
24 Oct 24 i  `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
27 Oct 24 `* Re: squeezing a field3Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
27 Oct 24  `* Re: squeezing a field2john larkin
31 Oct 24   `- Re: squeezing a field1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal