Re: squeezing a field

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: squeezing a field
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Oct 2024, 21:56:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1r1ycdl.17sbr9wqmmq68N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 18:45:20 +0200, Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk>
wrote:
[...]
plugging numbers pulled out of thin air into LTSpice is better that
doing the actual measurement?


 
It is for people who don't actually work with real parts.


Peter Baxandall (of tone control and QUAD amplifier fame) claimed to use
analogue computing to work out his designs  i.e. He built prototypes and
measured them.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Oct 24 * squeezing a field41john larkin
23 Oct 24 +* Re: squeezing a field37Phil Hobbs
23 Oct 24 i`* Re: squeezing a field36john larkin
24 Oct 24 i +* Re: squeezing a field33Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i i`* Re: squeezing a field32Lasse Langwadt
24 Oct 24 i i +* Re: squeezing a field30john larkin
24 Oct 24 i i i`* Re: squeezing a field29Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i +* Re: squeezing a field17john larkin
25 Oct 24 i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field16Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field13Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field12Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field10john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i+- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field8Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field6Phil Hobbs
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field5Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i `* Re: squeezing a field4Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field3Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   +- Re: squeezing a field1Dennis
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   `- Re: squeezing a field1Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i +- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1legg
25 Oct 24 i i i `* Re: squeezing a field11Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  +* Re: squeezing a field4Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i  i`* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  i +- Re: squeezing a field1John R Walliker
25 Oct 24 i i i  i `- Re: squeezing a field1Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field6legg
27 Oct 24 i i i   `* Re: squeezing a field5Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i i i    `* Re: squeezing a field4legg
28 Oct 24 i i i     `* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
28 Oct 24 i i i      `* Re: squeezing a field2piglet
28 Oct 24 i i i       `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: squeezing a field2legg
24 Oct 24 i  `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
27 Oct 24 `* Re: squeezing a field3Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
27 Oct 24  `* Re: squeezing a field2john larkin
31 Oct 24   `- Re: squeezing a field1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal