Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. Oct 2024, 00:32:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1rllhjt07jaklm8po65t6rr5753jpr0af7@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:19:52 +0100, John R Walliker
<jrwalliker@gmail.com> wrote:

On 24/10/2024 21:56, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
 
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:39:03 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 24/10/2024 4:44 am, john larkin wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:10:41 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
But I suspect that component tolerances and mismatched FETs will ruin it.
>
The very best bulk metal foil resistors have voltage-resistance
coefficients of a few ppm/volt. Most resistors are much worse.
>
Metal film resistors aren't all that much worse than bulk foil
resistors, and they are pretty cheap aznd widely available.
>
Just the resistors can kill distortion specs.
>
Not that you can cite an example
>
At low frequencies, self-heating and tempco can add distortion too;
>
Pull the other leg.
>
The old HP oscillators
had that effect from the lamp filament.
>
The lamp filaments ran rather hotter.
>
DGMS on capacitor nonlinearity.
The capacitors and resistors would have to remarkably bad to make much
difference to a well-designed Wein bridge.
>
You've already got started on making an ass of yourself about resistor
non-linearities. Making bizarre claims about capacitors is more of the same.
>
Gosh, you keep getting nastier and crazier every year. Your only
function now seems to be to generate childish insults aimed at most
everyone.
>
Here's some C-V notes. Series AC-coupling caps, or caps used in
filters, can introduce distortion too.
>
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/akiyipqep6n67glfjhcea/ACfQ6By9LRZPKey4tgvpd
DE?rlkey=is0vbs7m6xft5u9as5r8eyp30&dl=0
>
It's sort of outrageous that most ceramic cap data sheets specify
capacitance and voltage and hide the fact that you don't get both.
>
Film caps can have C-V effects too, and those can matter at PPM
distortion levels.
>
One could make a parametric amplifier using cap C-V effect.
 
Some ceramic caps make rather poor-quality contact microphones, so don't
use them in audio pre-amps.
 
 
... but COG/NPO ceramics are very well suited to this application.
>
John

They tend to be small values. We use one 10 nF part. Digikey offers a
0.88 uF C0G for $29. Each!

I had some N4700s cooked up special, to temperature compensate an LC
oscillator.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Oct 24 * High purity 1kHz oscillator37Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator7Bill Sloman
22 Oct 24 i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator6Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 i +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator4john larkin
22 Oct 24 i i+- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Edward Rawde
23 Oct 24 i i+- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
22 Nov 24 i i`- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Waldek Hebisch
23 Oct 24 i `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
22 Oct 24 +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator5Edward Rawde
23 Oct 24 i+- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1legg
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator3Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator2legg
25 Oct 24 i  `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
23 Oct 24 +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator15JM
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator14JM
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator13JM
25 Oct 24 i  `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator12Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i   `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator11Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i    `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator10JM
25 Oct 24 i     `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator9JM
25 Oct 24 i      `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator8Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i       `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator7JM
25 Oct 24 i        `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator6Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i         `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator5JM
26 Oct 24 i          `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator4Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i           `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator3JM
26 Oct 24 i            `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator2Bill Sloman
29 Oct 24 i             `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman
23 Oct 24 `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator9john larkin
24 Oct 24  `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator8Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24   `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator7john larkin
24 Oct 24    +* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator5Liz Tuddenham
24 Oct 24    i`* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator4John R Walliker
25 Oct 24    i `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator3john larkin
25 Oct 24    i  `* Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator2Phil Hobbs
25 Oct 24    i   `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1john larkin
25 Oct 24    `- Re: High purity 1kHz oscillator1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal