Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:34:29 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
"piglet" <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote in messageThe other legacy of unreliable dots (I suppose they used to fall off
news:vf3ntu$i9cd$1@dont-email.me...On 20/10/2024 7:59 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:>"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in messageLT Spice will happily accept 2k47 for 2470 ohms - you can even use
news:2rjahj1m5itht9k5nlh5p9q11onumbbb5s@4ax.com...On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:32:45 +0200, Jeroen Belleman>
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>On 10/20/24 19:18, Cursitor Doom wrote:>John Larkin has from time to time posted some elementary questions>
he likes to torture his job applicants with. I'd like to propose
one of my own.
>
If I'm measuring 218 ohms between points A and B in this diagram,
what is the value of Rx?
>
https://disk.yandex.com/i/hxjWx0tDUCzxiA
517 Ohms.
>
Jeroen Belleman
Does R330 mean 0.33 ohms?
>
I hate that sort of notation, like 2k47.
I keep having difficulty not using it in LTSpice.
>
0.33 ohms would be 0R33
>
>
>
0meg33 if you want for 330k in the old Soviet way
The reason I try to avoid it outside locations where it's not questioned
is because there's always someone who will ask what does 2k7 mean? :)
>
>piglet>
drawings 50 years ago) is people who refuse to make a clean 4-way
connection with one dot. They insist on using two 3-ways, two dots with
a clumsy offset.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.