Re: squeezing a field

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:08:08 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:

<snip>

He was remarkably good, just not totally perfect.
>
His footnote reference to "squegging" in the 1959 class-D oscillator
paper is another minor drop-off. He can't be blamed for it, but a
super-hero might have done better.

What's wrong with 'squegging' ? It's a simple word that covers
a host of faults that all give the same approximate symptom . .

RL