Re: squeezing a field

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: squeezing a field
De : joegwinn (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Joe Gwinn)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 26. Oct 2024, 22:30:13
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l9nqhjhpfsa9quohhvpbjv1e29num3s2lv@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:19:57 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
>
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:41:05 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
[...]
>
A G3 won't run Linux or any of the OSX applications.
 
Yeah.  Linux will run on anything that will run Windows on Intel.
Which modern Intel Macs will do.  I have such a Mac, and run both
MacOS and Windows on it.  I bet that the new Apple silicon will run
Windows in emulation as well.
>
This machine is a G3 running Mac OS 8.6, it is not Intel-based and
cannot run Windows or Linux or OSX.

Yes, I know.

I'm suggesting that it may be time for a small upgrade, say from the
stone age to the bronze age.  Don't want to rush headlong into
anything, so stop before the iron age.

I also have a windows laptop bought specifically for lab stuff that
MacOs will never do, not even from Win10 running on the iMac (which is
too big to schlepp around my little lab anyway).  Although I can run
LTSpice on the iMac, I could run Spice on the lab laptop as well.

Joe Gwinn

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Oct 24 * squeezing a field41john larkin
23 Oct 24 +* Re: squeezing a field37Phil Hobbs
23 Oct 24 i`* Re: squeezing a field36john larkin
24 Oct 24 i +* Re: squeezing a field33Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i i`* Re: squeezing a field32Lasse Langwadt
24 Oct 24 i i +* Re: squeezing a field30john larkin
24 Oct 24 i i i`* Re: squeezing a field29Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i +* Re: squeezing a field17john larkin
25 Oct 24 i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field16Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field13Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field12Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field10john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i+- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field8Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i +* Re: squeezing a field6Phil Hobbs
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i`* Re: squeezing a field5Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i `* Re: squeezing a field4Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field3Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   +- Re: squeezing a field1Dennis
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i i   `- Re: squeezing a field1Joe Gwinn
26 Oct 24 i i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i i +- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i i i i `- Re: squeezing a field1legg
25 Oct 24 i i i `* Re: squeezing a field11Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  +* Re: squeezing a field4Liz Tuddenham
25 Oct 24 i i i  i`* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i i  i +- Re: squeezing a field1John R Walliker
25 Oct 24 i i i  i `- Re: squeezing a field1Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i i i  `* Re: squeezing a field6legg
27 Oct 24 i i i   `* Re: squeezing a field5Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i i i    `* Re: squeezing a field4legg
28 Oct 24 i i i     `* Re: squeezing a field3Bill Sloman
28 Oct 24 i i i      `* Re: squeezing a field2piglet
28 Oct 24 i i i       `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
25 Oct 24 i i `- Re: squeezing a field1Bill Sloman
24 Oct 24 i `* Re: squeezing a field2legg
24 Oct 24 i  `- Re: squeezing a field1john larkin
27 Oct 24 `* Re: squeezing a field3Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
27 Oct 24  `* Re: squeezing a field2john larkin
31 Oct 24   `- Re: squeezing a field1Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal