Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 27. Oct 2024, 05:12:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfkek5$3ua2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 27/10/2024 8:41 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:12:39 -0700, john larkin wrote:
 
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:34:44 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:55:10 +0100, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>
john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 01:59:03 +0200, Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk>
wrote:
>
On 10/20/24 23:17, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 01:18:29 +0530, Pimpom
<Pimpom@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
>
On 21-10-2024 12:46 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 12:12:22 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 14:59:18 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
"john larkin" <JL@gct.com> wrote in message
news:2rjahj1m5itht9k5nlh5p9q11onumbbb5s@4ax.com...
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:32:45 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>
On 10/20/24 19:18, Cursitor Doom wrote:
John Larkin has from time to time posted some elementary
questions he likes to torture his job applicants with. I'd
like to propose one of my own.
>
If I'm measuring 218 ohms between points A and B in this
diagram, what is the value of Rx?
>
https://disk.yandex.com/i/hxjWx0tDUCzxiA
>
517 Ohms.
>
Jeroen Belleman
>
Does R330 mean 0.33 ohms?
>
I hate that sort of notation, like 2k47.
>
I keep having difficulty not using it in LTSpice.
>
0.33 ohms would be 0R33
>
>
Unless you believe in physics/SI notation.
>
So is R330 the reference designator?
>
Sorry, foreign notation. It's 330 ohms and 47 ohms.
>
Thought so.
Personally, I sometimes use the European style of placing decimal
values after the unit name, especially when space is limited as
in a packed schematic. 4k7 takes up slightly less space than 4.7k
*and* there's no chance of missing the decimal point. Likewise
values like 6n8
>
Maybe european decimal points slide off drawings and fall on the
floor. Robust American decimal points and schematic connect dots
don't do that.
>
How are things priced in a grocery store? Is the 'euros' symbol
straddled by numbers on both sides?
>
no but ? is behind the number not in front of it like $ ;)
>
>
But if it's priced in cents, the cents symbol goes last.
>
We follow SI rules in engineering, but in everyday life the quirky
old stuff is sort of fun. We measure distances in blocks or football
fields and fluid volume in olympic-size swimming pools, or sometimes
acre-feet.
>
4k7 is not an SI unit of measure.
>
...or even measurement?
>
I once heard the BBC's ' Environment Analyst' describe air pressure in
Degrees Centigrade.
>
That's what happens in organisations like the BBC where capability in a
given field comes a poor second to racial and gender recruiting quotas.
>
What can you expect from a country that has a House of Twits?
 Well, they have one now, but it was not always thus.
The original House of Lords (as constituted for around 700 years) was a
genuinely respectable institution. Those who were elevated to the peerage
were required to submit to the doctrine of Noblesse oblige and so to put
the interests of the lower orders above their own. Sadly, that's all gone
by the wayside over the last 150 years or so and now there is but a cohort
of grifters who have taken over this once noble House. Sad but true.
Sad if it were true. In reality the House of Lords is now dominated by life peers, who get promoted after a life-time devoted to exhibiting exceptional competence. There have been scandals about people buying their peerage, but people with that kind of money and power are less interested in becoming life peers than they were in getting a heritable honour. If Boris Johnson hasn't been caught trying to sell one, there clearly isn't the market there used to be.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Oct 24 * Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)101Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)95Jeroen Belleman
20 Oct 24 i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)94john larkin
20 Oct 24 i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)91Edward Rawde
20 Oct 24 i i+* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)83john larkin
20 Oct 24 i ii`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)82Cursitor Doom
20 Oct 24 i ii `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)81john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)12Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 i ii  i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii  i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)10john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)6Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 i ii  i  i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3john larkin
23 Oct 24 i ii  i  i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Jan Panteltje
23 Oct 24 i ii  i  i    `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Clive Arthur
21 Oct 24 i ii  i   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
22 Oct 24 i ii  i   `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)12Lasse Langwadt
21 Oct 24 i ii  i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)8Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)7Cursitor Doom
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4john larkin
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii  i i i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i ii  i i i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
26 Oct 24 i ii  i i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii  i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Phil Hobbs
21 Oct 24 i ii  i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
21 Oct 24 i ii  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)56Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii   +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii   i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Tom Del Rosso
21 Oct 24 i ii   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)51Tom Del Rosso
21 Oct 24 i ii    +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 i ii    i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Liz Tuddenham
21 Oct 24 i ii    i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Reinhard Zwirner
22 Oct 24 i ii    i `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
26 Oct 24 i ii    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)46Cursitor Doom
26 Oct 24 i ii     +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
26 Oct 24 i ii     `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)44john larkin
26 Oct 24 i ii      `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)43Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii       `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)42john larkin
27 Oct 24 i ii        +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Bill Sloman
27 Oct 24 i ii        i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Liz Tuddenham
28 Oct 24 i ii        i +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
28 Oct 24 i ii        i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i  `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
27 Oct 24 i ii        +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)34Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii        i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)33john larkin
27 Oct 24 i ii        i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
27 Oct 24 i ii        i i+- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
27 Oct 24 i ii        i i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Phil Hobbs
28 Oct 24 i ii        i +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)17Jan Panteltje
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)16john larkin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)15Jan Panteltje
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i  +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1wmartin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)13john larkin
28 Oct 24 i ii        i i   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11Jan Panteltje
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)6Liz Tuddenham
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Jan Panteltje
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4Liz Tuddenham
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Jan Panteltje
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Liz Tuddenham
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i    i    `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
29 Oct 24 i ii        i i    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3john larkin
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i     `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Jan Panteltje
30 Oct 24 i ii        i i      `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Liz Tuddenham
16 Nov 24 i ii        i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)12Tom Del Rosso
16 Nov 24 i ii        i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)11john larkin
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Phil Hobbs
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   i+* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   ii`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Phil Hobbs
18 Nov 24 i ii        i   ii `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1ehsjr
16 Nov 24 i ii        i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5Cursitor Doom
16 Nov 24 i ii        i    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)4john larkin
16 Nov 24 i ii        i     `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
17 Nov 24 i ii        i      `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
17 Nov 24 i ii        i       `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Cursitor Doom
28 Oct 24 i ii        `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Phil Hobbs
17 Nov 24 i ii         `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
20 Oct 24 i i`* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)7piglet
21 Oct 24 i i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)6Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 i i  `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)5john larkin
21 Oct 24 i i   +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
26 Oct 24 i i   `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)3Cursitor Doom
26 Oct 24 i i    `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
27 Oct 24 i i     `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Bill Sloman
21 Oct 24 i `* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2Clive Arthur
21 Oct 24 i  `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
20 Oct 24 +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1john larkin
20 Oct 24 +* Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)2john larkin
21 Oct 24 i`- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Edward Rawde
21 Oct 24 +- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Jan Panteltje
21 Oct 24 `- Re: Interview Question (your Sunday ruined part 2)1Tom Del Rosso

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal