Re: Be very, very afraid...

On a sunny day (Sun, 27 Oct 2024 08:34:49 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Cursitor
Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote in <vfktv9$7486$1@dont-email.me>:

On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 05:53:10 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>

On a sunny day (Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:43:26 -0700) it happened Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in <vfk2bp$3ueps$1@dont-email.me>:
 

No, not that AI is going to take your job ("render you redundant") but,
rather, that it is going to be relied upon for information that is
provably incorrect:
>
<https://apnews.com/article/ai-artificial-intelligence-health-

business-90020cdf5fa16c79ca2e5b6c4c9bbb14>

>
it seems the most expeditious way to get these sorts of problems fixed
is NOT to regulate how it can be used but, rather, to hold firms using
it financially (criminally?) accountable for its follies...

 
Sure, like doctors tha'st make mistakes:
 https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/33/2/109
 
Does them using AI reduce errors?
If so they could be accountable for not using it...
Like a second opinion, always required?
 
It is complicated..
hacked;-)
Power outage...
etc etc

>
Anyone concerned about medical confidentiality should *never* consent to
having their records held in digital form anyway. Databases holding such
info are prime targets for cyberattacks, as the UK's NHS is quickly
finding out.

My medical records are held in digital form and when I moved house I had to give consent for the records
to be made availabe to the local doctor here.
But those digital records only go back a few years.. to when they started with it.
Not much in there.