Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM

Sujet : Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM
De : sylvia (at) *nospam* email.invalid (Sylvia Else)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 31. Oct 2024, 16:01:30

Autres entêtes

Message-ID : <lohkeaFtm11U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1

On 31-Oct-24 8:46 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

SRAM scaling isn't dead after all — TSMC's 2nm process tech claims major improvements
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/sram-scaling-isnt-dead-after-all-tsmcs-2nm-process-tech-claims-major-improvements#main
gate all around tech...
38 Mb/mm^2

If my arithmetic is right, there are about 50 atoms of silicon per cubic nanometre. Surely we're approaching the limits of this.
Sylvia.

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
31 Oct 24	38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	12	Jan Panteltje
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	11	Sylvia Else
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	john larkin
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	9	Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	Phil Hobbs
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	john larkin
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	6	Joe Gwinn
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	3	Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	2	Phil Hobbs
1 Nov 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	2	john larkin
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	Joe Gwinn

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal