Newsportal USENET - Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM

Sujet : Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM
De : jeroen (at) *nospam* nospam.please (Jeroen Belleman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 31. Oct 2024, 17:36:23

Autres entêtes

Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg0bfe$2p01f$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

On 10/31/24 16:01, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 31-Oct-24 8:46 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
SRAM scaling isn't dead after all — TSMC's 2nm process tech claims major improvements
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/sram-scaling-isnt-dead-after-all-tsmcs-2nm-process-tech-claims-major-improvements#main
>
gate all around tech...
38 Mb/mm^2
>
If my arithmetic is right, there are about 50 atoms of silicon per cubic nanometre. Surely we're approaching the limits of this.
Sylvia.

The stated '2nm process' has little to do with the actual size
of features on the chip. It has become a sales argument rather
than the true size of something.
Jeroen Belleman

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
31 Oct 24	38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	12	Jan Panteltje
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	11	Sylvia Else
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	john larkin
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	9	Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	Phil Hobbs
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	john larkin
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	6	Joe Gwinn
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	3	Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	2	Phil Hobbs
1 Nov 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	Jeroen Belleman
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	2	john larkin
31 Oct 24	Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM	1	Joe Gwinn