Sujet : Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 31. Oct 2024, 17:37:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg0bnu$2p3fd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Jeroen Belleman <
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 10/31/24 16:01, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 31-Oct-24 8:46 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
SRAM scaling isn't dead after all — TSMC's 2nm process tech claims
major improvements
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/sram-scaling-isnt-dead-after-all-tsmcs-2nm-process-tech-claims-major-improvements#main
gate all around tech...
38 Mb/mm^2
If my arithmetic is right, there are about 50 atoms of silicon per cubic
nanometre. Surely we're approaching the limits of this.
Sylvia.
The stated '2nm process' has little to do with the actual size
of features on the chip. It has become a sales argument rather
than the true size of something.
Jeroen Belleman
It’s the 21st century, man. What matters is that the _names_ follow Moore’s
Law. Excelsior!
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 
38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM
Re: 38 Mb/mm^2 SRAM