Sujet : Re: OT: Programming Languages
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 02. Nov 2024, 00:03:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg3mnf$3egtc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 11/1/2024 3:50 PM, Nick Hayward wrote:
What about C++?
C++ is an order of magnitude more complex than C. Even a
casual C programmer can imagine what his code will look
like after compilation. I.e., can imagine exactly what the
CPU will be doing (ignoring the fact that the compiler will
often out-think the coder in terms of time/space efficiency).
With C++, there is just too much "magic" happening "between
the lines"... i.e., where there is no VISIBLE code executing.
Sadly, there are parts of C++ that would make good additions
to C -- but, not with all the extra baggage that gets dragged in.
[EC++ doesn't add anything *truly* worthwhile]