Re: OT: Programming Languages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT: Programming Languages
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 02. Nov 2024, 14:14:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg58kg$3q14j$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 11/2/2024 5:37 AM, Ian wrote:
Java, python, ruby, c#, rust and all other the modern shit can just [go away]
as far as I'm concerned - they're all non-solutions to the wrong problems.
Rust has some value as C-ish syntax but with stronger type checking.
And, its efforts to avoid pointer abuse.
But, like most languages, seems to want to make bad behaviors
illegal instead of teaching folks how to avoid them -- WHEN THEY
SHOULD BE AVOIDED (and not more!)  Imagine not being allowed to connect
one *component* to another out of fear you might not know what you
are doing!
[How, in C, do you effect a transfer of control to the instruction
at 0x0..0?  Should I also be prohibited from transfering control
to the instruction located at the maximum logical address?  Or, to
the current address??]
And, the whole notion of variable shadowing is annoying and
likely confusing:  WHAT (type!) is 'x', *now*?  Too arbitrary
scoping rules.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Nov 24 * OT: Programming Languages77Cursitor Doom
1 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Liz Tuddenham
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Don Y
2 Nov 24 i `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
1 Nov 24 +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
1 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages40Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages39Nick Hayward
2 Nov 24 i +* Re: OT: Programming Languages12Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages11john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i +* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Joe Gwinn
2 Nov 24 i i i+* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i ii`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Joe Gwinn
2 Nov 24 i i ii `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i i`- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Martin Brown
2 Nov 24 i i  +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Don Y
3 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Dennis
3 Nov 24 i i    `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 i +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages25Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i  +* Re: OT: Programming Languages16Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages15Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages14Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i  +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages12john larkin
3 Nov 24 i  i   +* Re: OT: Programming Languages10Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i   i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages9john larkin
3 Nov 24 i  i   i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages8Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i   i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages7john larkin
4 Nov 24 i  i   i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages6Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   i    `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
4 Nov 24 i  i   i     +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   i     `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3john larkin
5 Nov 24 i  i   i      `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Cursitor Doom
5 Nov 24 i  i   i       `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages8john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   +* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   i `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i   +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i   +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i    `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 +* Re: Programming Languages16Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: Programming Languages15Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: Programming Languages14Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  +* Re: Programming Languages12Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i  i+* Re: Programming Languages6Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  ii`* Re: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i  ii +* Re: Programming Languages2Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  ii i`- Re: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  ii `* Re: Programming Languages2Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  ii  `- Re: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: Programming Languages5Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: Programming Languages4Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: Programming Languages3Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i   `* Re: Programming Languages2Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i    `- Re: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  `- Re: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages12Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i+* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 ii`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 ii `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages8john larkin
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages7Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages6john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
4 Nov 24 i    +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i    `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3john larkin
4 Nov 24 i     `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Edward Rawde
5 Nov 24 i      `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Ian
2 Nov 24 i`- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
3 Nov 24 `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2maitre Aliboron
3 Nov 24  `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal