Re: OT: Programming Languages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT: Programming Languages
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 03. Nov 2024, 19:59:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg8h5l$g3ao$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 11/3/2024 8:30 AM, maitre Aliboron wrote:
Talking about structural "elegance" in my opinion (Common) LISP is one of the best. Data, structures, functions, even programs... everything is only atoms and lists.
Yes, but it is VERY hard for people to wrap their heads around.
Sort of like parsing a binary file -- there are no real
"identifying features" from which to get your bearings.
Lists are a great addition to a language but almost always
drag in the need for GC.
Folks often implement lists in other languages -- but, usually by
tainting the data type that is being listed.  E.g., adding a
"next (previous)" element(s) to a struct seems "free".  But,
implicitly changes the data type of the listed item.
E.g., how would you make a list of floats?
{ theFloat, *theNextFloat } is no longer a "float" but some
bastard data type.  Adding a float to said list would mean
converting it to one of these bastards *before* prepending it.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Nov 24 * OT: Programming Languages77Cursitor Doom
1 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Liz Tuddenham
1 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Don Y
1 Nov 24 i `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
1 Nov 24 +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
1 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages40Jeroen Belleman
1 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages39Nick Hayward
2 Nov 24 i +* Re: OT: Programming Languages12Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages11john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i +* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Joe Gwinn
2 Nov 24 i i i+* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i ii`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Joe Gwinn
2 Nov 24 i i ii `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i i`- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Martin Brown
2 Nov 24 i i  +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Dennis
3 Nov 24 i i    `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 i +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages25Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i  +* Re: OT: Programming Languages16Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages15Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages14Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i  +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages12john larkin
3 Nov 24 i  i   +* Re: OT: Programming Languages10Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i   i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages9john larkin
3 Nov 24 i  i   i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages8Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i   i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages7john larkin
4 Nov 24 i  i   i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages6Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   i    `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
4 Nov 24 i  i   i     +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   i     `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3john larkin
5 Nov 24 i  i   i      `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Cursitor Doom
5 Nov 24 i  i   i       `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages8john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   +* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   i `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i   +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i   +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i    `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 +* Re: Programming Languages16Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: Programming Languages15Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: Programming Languages14Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  +* Re: Programming Languages12Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i  i+* Re: Programming Languages6Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  ii`* Re: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i  ii +* Re: Programming Languages2Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  ii i`- Re: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  ii `* Re: Programming Languages2Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  ii  `- Re: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: Programming Languages5Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: Programming Languages4Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: Programming Languages3Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i   `* Re: Programming Languages2Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i    `- Re: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  `- Re: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages12Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i+* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 ii`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 ii `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages8john larkin
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages7Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages6john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
4 Nov 24 i    +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i    `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3john larkin
4 Nov 24 i     `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Edward Rawde
4 Nov 24 i      `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Ian
2 Nov 24 i`- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
3 Nov 24 `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2maitre Aliboron
3 Nov 24  `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal