Re: OT: Programming Languages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT: Programming Languages
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Nov 2024, 15:22:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgalc4$vm08$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/11/2024 6:30 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 09:08:36 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
 
On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 15:41:11 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Sat, 02 Nov 2024 07:55:18 -0700) it happened john larkin
<JL@gct.com> wrote in <dnecijt2s9um4l6a4qnq3j0ekto8fl955d@4ax.com>:
>
On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 07:42:19 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
>
On a sunny day (Fri, 1 Nov 2024 18:04:21 -0000 (UTC)) it happened Cursitor
Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote in <vg3575$3bio0$1@dont-email.me>:
>
You can call me old fashioned, but I still believe there's never been a
more elegant computer language than the original K&R C. You can keep the
rest; I'll stick with that.
>
Agree, I use C only and asm when needed.
I started with binary interfacing hardware...
Nothing of all of that was hard.
>
BASIC was fun too, but very limiting, slow interpreted language.
>
PowerBasic is a fabulous compiler. We did one contest, an array math
signal processing thing. I wrote it in PB, another guy in c. Mine ran
4 times as fast.  He played with the code and compiler optimiztions
for a couple of days and got it up to about 60% as fast as my PB
version.
>
I used the obvious FOR loop with subscripts to scan the array. He used
pointers.
>
c is really a PDP-11 assembler. In the early days of PDP-11
programming, everybody was fascinated with using pointers to wander up
and down the world, and with pushing stuff onto the stack. It shows in
c now.
>
I use for example C on my PCs and the Raspberry Pis I have.
C is yery portable, libraries and open source applications everywhere.
gcc is a nice compiler that supports many architectures.
Stuff I wrote for the PC in C comp[iles and runs on the Raspberries...
This Usenet newsreader I use now I wrote in the late nineties when moving to Linux
as there was no Free Agent for Linux...
Still using it, now posting from a Pi4 8 GB.
It uses linked lists, I have a database of Usenet postings going back to these days.
https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/newsflex/index.html
There are some compatibility issues, but that is because the graphics library I use
had some changes, but can work around it.
More C code:
https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/newsflex/download.html
There is a simple 8052 assembler written in C on that webpage too.
And a z80 dissasembler .
https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/z80/index.html
etc etc
My website is basic html.
>
>
>
The guy who wrote the PDP-11 assembler said that it was really a
language processor. We built several cross-assemblers as macros within
the PDP-11 assembler, including the 6800, 6802, 6803, and 68332
processors.
 Steve Gibson of grc.com is heavily into PDP-8s and his site has a good
selection of info on 'em if anyone's interested.
 
Amazingly, Digikey will still sell you a 68332.
 Price?
You could go to the Digikey website and look it up for yourself. Digikey Australia doesn't seem to stock it.
Digikey in America lists an NXP part with a similar part number, but shows it as "no longer in production".
John Larkin may be able to do better, but he didn't post a URL.
Maybe he was relying on his memory of previous purchases. Not wise at his age.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Nov 24 * OT: Programming Languages77Cursitor Doom
1 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Liz Tuddenham
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Don Y
2 Nov 24 i `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
1 Nov 24 +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
1 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages40Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages39Nick Hayward
2 Nov 24 i +* Re: OT: Programming Languages12Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages11john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i +* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Joe Gwinn
2 Nov 24 i i i+* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i ii`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Joe Gwinn
2 Nov 24 i i ii `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 i i i`- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Martin Brown
2 Nov 24 i i  +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1john larkin
2 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Don Y
3 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Dennis
3 Nov 24 i i    `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 i +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages25Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i  +* Re: OT: Programming Languages16Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages15Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages14Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i  +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages12john larkin
3 Nov 24 i  i   +* Re: OT: Programming Languages10Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i   i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages9john larkin
3 Nov 24 i  i   i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages8Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i   i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages7john larkin
4 Nov 24 i  i   i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages6Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   i    `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
4 Nov 24 i  i   i     +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   i     `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3john larkin
5 Nov 24 i  i   i      `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Cursitor Doom
5 Nov 24 i  i   i       `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i  i   `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages8john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   +* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   i `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i   +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i   +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Jeroen Belleman
2 Nov 24 i    `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
2 Nov 24 +* Re: Programming Languages16Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: Programming Languages15Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: Programming Languages14Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  +* Re: Programming Languages12Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i  i+* Re: Programming Languages6Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  ii`* Re: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i  ii +* Re: Programming Languages2Edward Rawde
2 Nov 24 i  ii i`- Re: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  ii `* Re: Programming Languages2Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  ii  `- Re: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: Programming Languages5Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: Programming Languages4Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: Programming Languages3Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  i   `* Re: Programming Languages2Cursitor Doom
3 Nov 24 i  i    `- Re: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
3 Nov 24 i  `- Re: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
2 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages12Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i+* Re: OT: Programming Languages3Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 ii`* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 ii `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 i`* Re: OT: Programming Languages8john larkin
2 Nov 24 i `* Re: OT: Programming Languages7Jan Panteltje
2 Nov 24 i  `* Re: OT: Programming Languages6john larkin
2 Nov 24 i   `* Re: OT: Programming Languages5Cursitor Doom
4 Nov 24 i    +- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Bill Sloman
4 Nov 24 i    `* Re: OT: Programming Languages3john larkin
4 Nov 24 i     `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Edward Rawde
5 Nov 24 i      `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Cursitor Doom
2 Nov 24 +* Re: OT: Programming Languages2Ian
2 Nov 24 i`- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y
3 Nov 24 `* Re: OT: Programming Languages2maitre Aliboron
3 Nov 24  `- Re: OT: Programming Languages1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal