Sujet : Re: The Venerable 741
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 04. Nov 2024, 16:21:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <25phijtd3qjkhd71qtbrs8a6a8ej280ku4@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 22:24:12 -0500, bitrex <
user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/3/2024 5:17 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 11/3/24 23:10, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 11/3/24 19:07, Cursitor Doom wrote:
It's been around an awfully long time and there are far better
alternatives out there. But is there still a case for using them in
certain niche applications in 2024?
>
I've used them in power supply regulators exposed to radiation.
Being old designs and all-NPN, they're pretty rad-hard.
>
Jeroen Belleman
Blimey, I just checked: It isn't all-NPN! Fortunately
for me, it still kept working under irradiation...
Jeroen Belleman
>
Have to go back to Jim Thompson's MC1530 era to get that:
>
<http://www.elektronikjk.com/elementy_czynne/IC/MC1530-2.pdf>
He probably designed that without Spice.
The first IC opamp I tried was made by GE. All NPN, with an internal
zener in the level-shift part. It was amazingly noisy.
I designed some little baby-board opamps, all TO-92 transistors and
folded-over axial parts. By selecting some resistors we got sub 1 mV
offset and under 1 uV/degC, but it was tedious.
I still have some Philbrick opamps that I found at a flea market.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/tujdcjpvv7m4b2yo8w751/Philbricks.jpg?rlkey=19ivv2tgqmqiy9ci92lgysrz7&raw=1