Re: OT: Don't let Peanut Die For Nothing

On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:11:28 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 11/6/2024 2:21 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>
wrote:
 

On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:

I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states.  I
challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.

>
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary.  I did *not* see that coming!
I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results,
that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges.
>
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.

 
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any
fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to
even contemplate.

The polls were pretty much bang on; that _someone_ would likely sweep
the swing states was known for weeks, months. The scenarios where swing
states got split were statistically unlikely.
>
Running a candidate like Kamala who had not even a primary mandate and
three months to do a not particularly inspiring campaign up against a
billionaire celebrity like Trump was a big gamble, anyone with a brain
knew that. Did the Democrats? Who can say..
>
>
>
>
>

What would really be interesting is a Cabinet with one guy who was a
poor hillbilly orphan, and another guy who is the richest person on
Earth.

I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance.