Sujet : Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 07. Nov 2024, 00:20:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <n5unijlr25iffo7v22eb3rhg5pcnrk87nv@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 22:15:38 +0000,
liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
>
[...]
It's interesting that the classic filters (Butterworth, Chebychev,
Cauer) are based on mathematical approximations that pre-date
electronics. They were used to compose tables for artillery or
something.
>
Chebychef did his calculations on the mechancal lnkages used to operate
the valves of steam locomotives, generating linear motion and sharp
movement from the superimposed effects of rotary motions.
I think the general idea is that if you truncate a power series, here
is a better set of coefficients than just chopping off the infinite
set.
That mattered when math tables were computed by hand. Nowadays, a
computer can just use the first 150 terms.