Sujet : Re: OT: Don't let Peanut Die For Nothing
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 12. Nov 2024, 03:30:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgueka$199mq$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/11/2024 9:48 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:26:30 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:49:46 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:34:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>
<snip>
>
>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
>
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
>
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
>
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist.
>
Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
Bill. ;->
>
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
>
Sigh... Yes, I will. However, you *really* should lead by example here
and stop feeding him yourself. I've noticed you provide him with a
pretty rich diet. So I'll do a deal with you (not that the last one
concerning a burger and fries got me very far, but still) if you cease
to respond to Bill's barbs, I'll do likewise. Agreed? In the interests
of group harmony, please consider making the sacrifice along with me.
>
Feeding him?
>
I had been trying, roughly once a year, to engage him on not-personal
issues, like electronics even, but it doesn't help. He keeps getting
nastier.
>
Haven't you noticed that he insults everyone? Badly.
His limited vocabulary kind of lets him down on that front. Perhaps in
the old days it was more expansive, I can't recall.
Cursitor Doom thinks that it would take a large vocabulary to characterise his character defects. He's fooling himself.
It takes a small, if specialised, vocabulary. If he had the wit, or the inclination to read more of my output he been exposed to a wider range of words.
Anyway, let's agree to just not respond to him. Both of us. Let's just
not feed him any more. Deal?
Of course they would both have to give up posting fatuous nonsense to get the effect Cursitor Doom seems to want. That would be a big ask.
They'd have to learn how to identify fatuous nonsense first.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
OT: Don't let Peanut Die For Nothing
Re: OT: Don't let Peanut Die For Nothing