Re: OT: Don't let Peanut Die For Nothing

On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:55:38 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:

On 12/11/2024 10:08 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 20:38:14 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
 

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
<usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
>

On 2024-11-07, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:

In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...

>
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
>
>
>

>
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel.

>
It wasn't about "crime" it was about an animal bite.
There are no non-fatal tests for rabies in humans or animals

>
Squirrels almost never get rabies.

 
And yet those demonic Democrats murdered him anyway.

>
You can't murder a squirrel. You can kill it, but murder is specific to
humans.
>

What a bunch of jerks.

>
Making it less likely that people will get rabies isn't the action of a
jerk.
>

This is precisely the kind of petty town hall interference that
Trump needs to break up and destroy.

>
And Trump is dim enough to see it that way. He's not actually all that
stupid, but he seems to be incapable of the kind of attention span that
would let him place the action in context. Curistor Doom is equally
ill-informed, and somewhat dimmer.
>
They both seem to be thoroughly ill-informed on climate change. Cursitor
Doom went on quixotic quest to find old and misleading data to bolster
his ill-founded opinions. Trump wouldn't have bothered.

Whatever, Bill. I'm not going to carry on these pointless exchanges
any longer. I have a deal with John I plan to honour.