Re: MEMS again

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: MEMS again
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 13. Nov 2024, 23:12:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <368ajjh86iork4kr7vsj0kk91phjcg5824@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 19:00:29 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:16:54 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
Menlo Micro is making some grand claims for their power and RF relays.
They appear to be electrostatic MEMS relays. Lots of people have tried
that in the past couple of decades, but the parts haven't been
reliable.
>
https://menlomicro.com/images/general/MM5130_Datasheet.pdf
>
On-State Insertion Loss is only stated at 6Ghz. I'd be interested to
know what it is closer to the top end. A graph would be better,
though.

All the parts can only cold switch. That would seem to be a problem,
especially for the power parts. How do you cold switch a circuit
breaker?

The two killers of MEMS relays have always been contacts frying and
contacts sticking.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Nov 24 * MEMS again6john larkin
13 Nov 24 `* Re: MEMS again5Cursitor Doom
13 Nov 24  +- Re: MEMS again1Cursitor Doom
13 Nov 24  `* Re: MEMS again3john larkin
14 Nov 24   `* Re: MEMS again2Cursitor Doom
14 Nov 24    `- Re: MEMS again1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal