Re: LT Spice looks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: LT Spice looks
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 15. Nov 2024, 10:51:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1r325av.1jndifp1idpnxeN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:01:08 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
 
john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

[...]
Won't work. The batteries are backwards.
>
It depends which battery convention you use, there doesn't seem to be a
standard which is universally accepted.
 
Usually the long side is positive.

I have seen both conventions, so neither is 'usual'.  To avoid confusion
I normally put + and - signs against the battery terminals in my
diagrams  - but I didn't in this case because I thought it would detract
from the point I was trying to make about the layout.  Similarly I
didn't include component numbers or values.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Nov 24 * LT Spice looks26john larkin
13 Nov 24 +* Re: LT Spice looks24legg
13 Nov 24 i`* Re: LT Spice looks23john larkin
13 Nov 24 i +* Re: LT Spice looks9john larkin
13 Nov 24 i i`* Re: LT Spice looks8Edward Rawde
13 Nov 24 i i `* Re: LT Spice looks7john larkin
13 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: LT Spice looks6Edward Rawde
13 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: LT Spice looks5john larkin
13 Nov 24 i i    `* Re: LT Spice looks4Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i i     `* Re: LT Spice looks3john larkin
14 Nov 24 i i      `* Re: LT Spice looks2Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i i       `- Re: LT Spice looks1john larkin
14 Nov 24 i `* Re: LT Spice looks13Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i  +- Re: LT Spice looks1Jan Panteltje
14 Nov 24 i  +* Re: LT Spice looks6john larkin
14 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: LT Spice looks5Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i  i `* Re: LT Spice looks4john larkin
14 Nov 24 i  i  `* Re: LT Spice looks3Liz Tuddenham
15 Nov 24 i  i   `* Re: LT Spice looks2john larkin
15 Nov 24 i  i    `- Re: LT Spice looks1Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i  `* Re: LT Spice looks5Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i   `* Re: LT Spice looks4Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i    `* Re: LT Spice looks3Edward Rawde
14 Nov 24 i     `* Re: LT Spice looks2Liz Tuddenham
14 Nov 24 i      `- Re: LT Spice looks1Edward Rawde
13 Nov 24 `- Re: LT Spice looks1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal