Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vhjj2v$24eu4$3@dont-email.me...<snip>On 20/11/2024 1:29 pm, Bill Sloman wrote:On 20/11/2024 12:59 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vhibce$1t7v2$1@dont-email.me...On 18/11/2024 2:58 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:"JM" <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> wrote in message news:n7iijjdeqecl0kmub0bq5in0dbm60m7qam@4ax.com...On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:14:28 -0500, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>"JM" <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> wrote in message news:t5fajjdteskfftvkf84iqsp2vc4b9ta5kj@4ax.com...On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:43:41 -0500, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
But you don't seem to be able to tell us what they do.I've no idea why you are using the LT1994. The circuit doesn't have a common mode problem, so why are you using an op amp designedIn that case please show a circuit with better performance.
to deal with one?
>
This is sci.electronics.design not sci.electronics.incremental-development.
>
And the six diode "stabiliser string" is nuts. If you need a 3.6V reference voltage there are lots of ways to do it with more
precision and better temperature stability.
It may be that some of the circuits JM posted can do better but if so then why are you using a circuit with so many components?
My circuit has far fewer components than yours.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.