Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 21/11/2024 8:47 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:On a sunny day (Thu, 21 Nov 2024 17:45:17 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman>
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhmku6$hfh9$4@dont-email.me>:
On 21/11/2024 2:27 pm, john larkin wrote:On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:55:12 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:13:19 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
<snip>
>Russia versus YouCrane>
It makes no sense other then weapon sales, weakening Europe, same as that other democrat Clinton did.
Russia seems to think it makes sense. It's been working on nibbling off
bits of the Ukraine for years - starting with the Crimean peninsula in
2014. Zelensky wasn't in power back then. He didn't get elected until 2019.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation
>
This didn't generate much in the way of weapons sales. The Russian
invasion of the Ukraine in 2022 did generate quite a lot of weapons
sales, but that was a purely Russian initiative.
If you have a problem getting loose a big nut, use BIG pliers!>
The nut in this case is Zelensky and sending toy drones is like destroying one precious tweezers after the other to get it
lose.
Zelensky didn't start the war, and his crime - in your eyes - lies in
his not having surrendered to the Russians in 2022 as they clearly
expected him to.
>Get the biggest pliers you have and that is nukes for Russia, nuke Kiev and be done with it>
Bad? And what did the US do in WW2 with the Japanese civilians?
The Japanese did start that war - by the surprise attack on the American
fleet at Pearl Harbour. It four years of very skilled and expensive work
to get the Americans big enough pliers to discourage in the nuts in Tokyo.
>
Dropping hydrogen bombs on Kyiv might win the war against the Ukraine
for the Russians, but the international reaction would probably drop a
lot of hydrogen bombs on Moscow and every place where Russia has stocks
of nuclear weapons. If Putin got that ambitious there's no telling where
he would go next, and premptive destruction would probably minimise
Western casualties in the long term - they'd probably still be huge,
but a premptive strike would probably destroy enough Russian nuclear
weapons to save some lives in the long run.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.