Re: Curve Tracers

On 23/11/2024 5:11 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:43:21 -0800, john larkin wrote:
 

On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 23:35:13 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:03:00 -0800, john larkin wrote:
>

On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:02:28 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:37:39 -0800, john larkin wrote:
>

On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:10 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:27:04 -0800, john larkin wrote:
>

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:00:34 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 07:40:08 -0800, john larkin wrote:
>

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:32:32 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>

Gentlemen,
>
Curve tracers reveal useful info about the dynamic
characteristics of semiconductors and make designing for same
much more predictable and dependable than relying on spice
models and simulation alone. But they're typically rare beasts
and expensive to come by and boat anchor varieties are seriously
heavy and bulky.
I think therefore that a curve tracer would make an excellent
project,
using the X&Y inputs of a scope as the display. Has anyone here
attempted this? I'd be interested to know what the main
challenges are likely to be.
>
-CD

>
I've considered it. It would be much more valuable if it traced
capacitances too.

>
A VNA is best for that. I've been using my big HP one this
afternoon to label some random bunches of caps and inductors whose
values I couldn't read. Trouble is, there doesn't seem to be much
agreement on what frequency to test these devices at. I've heard
100khz, 1Mhz,
10Mhz and 100Mhz mentioned from different sources. I'm pretty sure
the 100Mhz testing is for RF specified devices only, though. From
what I've seen, there's no reliable alternative to testing each
batch for oneself, because (certainly with ancient NOS leaded (as
in non-SMD) stock) you have no idea what frequency the factory
tested them at and different manufacturers in different countries
at different times used different methods!

>
What I want is C-V curves. I guess a VNA can do that with a some
bias tees and various power supplies.

>
If you only want C/V curves, what's wrong with a plain 'scope and a
pulse generator?

>
How would you do that?

>
Ah! Well, I obviously mis-read your earlier statement. My bad, soz.
>

The display should be on a computer and the data archived.

>
For people such as yourself, certainly. For me as a hobbyist, a
CRT is fine.

>
You have to read the analog screen and write down numbers. Or take
a picture.

>
It would only be a (slight) issue if I needed to share an image with
a third party. Aside from that, there's nothing I couldn't live
with. You're obviously requiring more than that, though.
>

I often just set up a breadboard and test parts. Last week I
blew out some power mosfet gates. Some have internal zeners;
this one doesn't.

>
I can kill a MOSFET at 50' just by looking at it (certainly in
winter). In fact I shock myself from all the static I build up and
it ain't funny. Having dry skin is great for when I touch HV by
accident (happens quite a lot) but the flip side is I accumulate
and hold static charge like no one else I know.

>
Some fets have protective gate zeners. They typically clamp at
+-40 volts.
>
Here in San Francisco, we never get static zapped. High humidity.

>
So you never need to wear a wrist/earth strap? That's a big plus. I
find them *so* restrictive and irritating when they (invariably)
catch on something.
>

Most mosfets drain avalanche, but the voltage is never
specified, in fact deliberately hidden. I have to measure that.
A good curve tracer should measure that too.
>
Currents should go down to picoamps.
>
The fact that there aren't many curve tracers for sale suggests
a small market.

>
But a market, though small perhaps, there must be.

>
Sure. It would be a fun project.

>
And with thanks to Trump's tariffs, you might even make a few buxx
out of it, too.

>
Is there going to be tariffs on USB capacitance-measuring curve
tracers?

>
Not specifically, but I imagine Trump will want tariffs on Chinese
imports in general, which should give some breathing space profit-wise
to US manufacturers.
I have to say I do admire Trump's job creation ideas, which should
produce solid results, as opposed to old Joe's approach of destroying
US jobs, seemingly on purpose. I say old Joe's approach, but what I
really mean is the approach of the Globalists who tell him and his ilk
what to do.

>
We should stop paying the Chinese for the shipping costs of cheap
junk,
for starters.

>
The US does that too?? Wow. I thought that was just a European thing.

>
The Chinese are a "disadvantaged country" per the International Postal
Union.

 That needs updating!
 

They will ship a cheap ebay thing here for free. It would cost me a
bundle to ship it back.

 Same here. Function generator arrived today direct from China and I didn't
have to pay a penny in sales tax for it. No duties whatsoever. Express
postage was free, too. The treasuries of Europe must be losing untold tens
of billions in taxes due to this. And yet everyone has to pay sales tax on
domestically-produced goods! It's madness on steroids. They'll probably
claim it would cost more to collect the tax than the revenue doing so
would generate, but that's indefensible BS plain and simple.

Inventing what you imagine will be their response and describing that imagined response as "indefensible BS plain and simple" is a pretty obvious example of indefensible BS.
If they were to conform to your prediction, then you would have been right, but a prophet you aren't up to much. Kamala Harris didn't win the recent US election, not matter how much your imaginary globalists might have like her too.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bil Sloman, Sydney