Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems
De : '''newspam''' (at) *nospam* nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Nov 2024, 16:11:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhvfn5$29b1d$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/11/2024 14:42, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 11/24/24 12:40, Martin Brown wrote:
There is a startup company in the UK called NatPower (no relation to the real National Power PLC aka NPower) claiming to have over 25 years of experience in BESS. They are proposing 1GW (sic) BESS in all sorts of brown and green field UK sites. They have no track record that I can find. Does anyone here know of any real international project(s) that they have actually done and more importantly *delivered*?
(their own PR or its uncritical repetition in the press doesn't count)
>
Their website is very slick indeed but I suspect that beauty is only skin deep. I am interesting in evidence of substance not PR fluff.
>
Can someone provide me with some rough estimates of what a 1GW class energy storage system ought to look like in terms of layout and the number of container sized units and space required?
(or at least sanity check my guesstimate below)
>
Assuming that they mean 1GWh I reckon it will be about 2000T of Lithium batteries. If each module is storage container sized and can contain 20m^2 of batteries I reckon it is about 100 units (twice that if I have over estimated how much battery you can safely fit in a module). I haven't been able to find any manufacturers specifications for them.
 It makes no sense to build large concentrated battery storage
facilities. Such installations should be  distributed.
I think you are quite likely right but there seems to be a global league table for building ever bigger ones much like with camera megapixels...
https://www.quantistry.com/blog/the-largest-batteries-in-the-world
In the UK there is a secondary problem that most of the power generation occurs in the north where it is windy and historically all the dirty coal fired power stations were, but most of the consumption is in London and the South East. Land prices are however much cheaper in the north.
Guess where they build the battery storage even though the provision of North South interconnectors is already borderline for peak load and there are known bottlenecks in addition.

Natpower seems to consist of only directors and managers. Not
a good sign.
Agreed.
--
Martin Brown

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Nov 24 * 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems68Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3legg
24 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Don
24 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Jeroen Belleman
24 Nov 24 i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems39TTman
24 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems38Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems35john larkin
24 Nov 24 i i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3TTman
24 Nov 24 i ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
25 Nov 24 i ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i i+- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems30Martin Brown
26 Nov 24 i i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems29john larkin
26 Nov 24 i i  +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
26 Nov 24 i i  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6Martin Brown
27 Nov 24 i i  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5john larkin
27 Nov 24 i i  i +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Bill Sloman
27 Nov 24 i i  i i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
27 Nov 24 i i  i +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
27 Nov 24 i i  i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems21Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems7Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i i   i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Joe Gwinn
30 Nov 24 i i   i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i   i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i   +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Liz Tuddenham
30 Nov 24 i i   i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i i   i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems10john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i    `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems9Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i     +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i     i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems4Jeroen Belleman
1 Dec 24 i i     ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Martin Brown
1 Dec 24 i i     ii +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Ian
1 Dec 24 i i     ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i i     i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24 i i     `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Liz Tuddenham
1 Dec 24 i i      `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Don Y
24 Nov 24 i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems8john larkin
24 Nov 24 i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5TTman
24 Nov 24 ii+- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 ii+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
24 Nov 24 iii`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1TTman
25 Nov 24 ii`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Joe Gwinn
25 Nov 24 i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
24 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Don Y
25 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Robert Roland
30 Nov 24 `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems12Clive Arthur
30 Nov 24  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems10john larkin
30 Nov 24  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems9Clive Arthur
30 Nov 24  i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems8john larkin
1 Dec 24  i  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6Clive Arthur
3 Dec 24  i  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5john larkin
3 Dec 24  i  i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems4Bill Sloman
3 Dec 24  i  i  `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Liz Tuddenham
3 Dec 24  i  i   `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Bill Sloman
3 Dec 24  i  i    `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Liz Tuddenham
1 Dec 24  i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal