Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 27/11/2024 16:41, Joe Gwinn wrote:On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:24:20 -0000 (UTC), Phil HobbsAt high enough frequencies there is no need for direct connection.
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:>>
Anyone had experience using metalization on glass (mirror)
as a ground plane or shield?
>
Any data on conductivity etc?
>
RL
>
The best quality second-surface mirrors are coated with silver, followed by
copper plating and a coat of paint. Those should be pretty good if you can
get wires on them.
A classic way to connect to such things is conductive silver epoxy,
probably to silver-plated copper wire. Not tin-plated for long-term
use.
.<https://www.masterbond.com/properties/silver-filled-electrically-conductive-adhesives>
As for shielding effectiveness, the key question is the resistance of
a square of the coating, connected only on opposite parallel sides.
Poorer ones have aluminum coatings around 2-3 nm thick and no plating.
Probably won't work, between high square resistance and oxide layer
preventing reliable connection.
Though people do use metallized Mylar film, with a long bare tinned
copper ground wire in direct contact with the aluminum side, and in a
cable this does work.
Joe Gwinn
Adhesive copper tape stuck to the varnish film on the back of an
ordinary mirror may provide enough capacitive coupling to make a
good connection. It all depends on the proposed application, which
we don't know.
John
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.