Re: Datasheet-flation?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Datasheet-flation?
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 29. Nov 2024, 04:15:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <3qbikjdvcnp41t8vnqtggo5nidqb9r654f@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:56:59 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:22:03 -0500, ehsjr <ehsjr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
On 11/26/2024 10:21 PM, Dave Platt wrote:
Back on the original subject a bit: it's not just huge data sheets
which can be... well, less than wonderful.  I invite you to take a
look at the sheet for the Skyworks SKY65050-372LF low noise
transistor.  The evaluation board schematic on page 8, and its
associated bill of materials, invite careful examination.
 
The fact that they went to the trouble of actually _saying_ that
the schematic diagram is a mess, rather than actually fixing it...
well, I assume this was a Management decision.  I think I'd
have been ashamed to be the Engineer, though.
 
>
It seems that the block diagram on page 1 may establish
the caliber of the documentation. :-(
>
(What's the emoticon for hold your nose?)
Ed
>
It's not even a block.
>
The RF geeks like to call fet pins RF_IN and RF_OUT and RF_COM,
whereas normal people say gate, drain, source. Maybe compromise on
SOME and MORE and NONE.
>
And their biasing algorithm is usually "turn the pot until it works."
>
I use $100 RF switches and PHEMTs and MMICs and $300 distributed amp
chips in time domain, to make pulses. The data sheets are pretty much
useless to me. You never know if a part will actually work under 100
MHz (some won't) , or if that's as low as their VNA will go.
>
Mini-Circuits has assured me that they have no interest in amplifying
pulses and will never have Spice models for their parts.
>
I wonder if Q-spice is intended to bring RF design into the 20th
Century. It's the 21st already so it's overdue.
>
We had to add a DC block here, and it didn't help that some of the RF
parts were poorly specified.
>
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3j1eyfu850n5bb3xwlx10/DC_Block.jpg?rlkey=055ej3zuo5siukis8q0aaj8ft&raw=1
>

And for SOT-143 fets, i believe that every possible pin numbering
scheme has been used, including the FxxxR (reversed pinout) versions,
CW and CCW numbers.

And the bigfoot can be on the left or the right side. It's usually a
source pin. The one across from it is the gate or sometimes the drain.
Not to mention enhancement and depletion and wirebonds tuned to one
band.

So when CEL EOLs a part, which they enjoy doing, it's a nuisance to
find a replacement.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/5rpsajll41lkiojh8qg6t/ALjyqBI8R3BMI0CXQFpOZxs?rlkey=m6ijaefcsso42hwc4zwyjhcz6&dl=0


Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Nov 24 * Re: Datasheet-flation?3ehsjr
29 Nov 24 `* Re: Datasheet-flation?2john larkin
29 Nov 24  `- Re: Datasheet-flation?1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal