Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma
De : alien (at) *nospam* comet.invalid (Jan Panteltje)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 30. Nov 2024, 08:12:35
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <viedt4$720q$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:51:22 +0100) it happened Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote in <vid5og$17b08$1@dont-email.me>:

On 11/29/24 16:27, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Nov 2024 01:15:15 +1100) it happened Bill Slowman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vici9s$13umg$1@dont-email.me>:
 
On 30/11/2024 12:00 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
A nuclear fusion startup just reached a milestone
in its bid to commercialize unlimited clean energy :
   https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/29/climate/nuclear-fusion-openstar/index.html
>
ITER inside out :-)
>
You really can't read, can you. It's got its plasma to 300,000 degrees
K, and ITER have got theirs to 150,000,000 degrees K, about 500 times
hotter. It maybe some kind of milestone for OpenStar, but they've got
lot of milestones to go before they'll have a product that they can sell.
>
And they are still trying to fuse hydrogen or deuterium, which produces
a lot of neutrons.
>
https://hb11.energy/
 
Looks a bit like that thing Larking was making stuff for, laser ignition
Not much coming from that at all.
Just playing stuff for kids/ training stuff for aspiring nuclear fishisicks..
That was discussed here last year or so.
 
is trying to fuse hydrogen and boron, which doesn't produce neutrons -
if the machine ever works it will last a whole lot longer than hydrogen
fusion machines, which will be damaged by the stray neutrons they
produce, if they ever work.
 
Would be nice to have small portable power sources, for in the home and cars etc etc.
>
Plutonium is dangerous, but the Viking spacecraft are still working after many decades.
[...]
>
It would be lovely to have 50kWTh or so of PU238 in the basement,
if it could be made cheaply enough. Power for a lifetime for the
whole house and then some.
>
238Pu and its decay daughters are predominantly alpha emitters,
which is easy to contain. An important problem would be to make
it fool-proof: Not an easy task. I wouldn't want it in a car,
for example.

Yep, some tinkerer would drill holes in the thing, maybe to fix it to the wall or something
There was a nice program on a German TV info channel, what was it called? 'This is Uranium"?
where they go back in time and show 'Pechblende' stored outside mines as 'worthless' (Pech in German means 'bad luck' in English)
because they were mining for something else... to Marie Curie and many scientists involved in understaning Uranium to the nuclear bombs on Japan.
It also made me wonder why Iran does not have the bomb yet, if the recent earthquakes there were nuclear bomb tests.
I mean they had ultra centrifuges for years, Siemes PLCs controlled that were then hacked to stop them .
Sure possible, but I worked with Siemens PLC guys for years,,, just wonder.
An other US game?
Or will is-a-hell be nuked into oblivion shortly ?
Trump seems to be anti-Iran?
US CIA now starting new wargames in Syria...
 radiation is interesting, was reading that gamma spectrometer group many years ago,
  https://groups.io/g/GammaSpectrometryGroup
building my own, playing with stuff:
  https://panteltje.nl/panteltje/pic/sc_pic/
WOW! time flies! Was 2010 or earlier.

I still have my gamma spectrometer and GM counter next to me on the table...
 https://panteltje.nl/pub/gamma_spectrometer_plus_probe_plus_geiger_counter_2_IMG_4185.JPG

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Nov 24 * New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma43Jan Panteltje
29 Nov 24 +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma41Bill Sloman
29 Nov 24 i`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma40Jan Panteltje
29 Nov 24 i +- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Liz Tuddenham
29 Nov 24 i +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma29Jeroen Belleman
29 Nov 24 i i+* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma3john larkin
29 Nov 24 i ii`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2Jeroen Belleman
29 Nov 24 i ii `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1john larkin
29 Nov 24 i i+* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma24Liz Tuddenham
29 Nov 24 i ii`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma23Jeroen Belleman
29 Nov 24 i ii `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma22Liz Tuddenham
29 Nov 24 i ii  `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma21Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii   +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma6john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii   i`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma5Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii   i `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma4john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii   i  `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma3Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii   i   `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i ii   i    `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i ii   `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma14Liz Tuddenham
30 Nov 24 i ii    `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma13Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii     `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma12john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii      `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma11Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i ii       `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma10john larkin
30 Nov 24 i ii        +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma8Jeroen Belleman
1 Dec 24 i ii        i+* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i ii        ii`- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24 i ii        i`* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma5Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i ii        i +* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2Jeroen Belleman
1 Dec 24 i ii        i i`- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i ii        i `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i ii        i  `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i ii        `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i i`- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma9Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i  `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma8Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i   `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma7Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i    `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma6Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i     `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma5Bill Sloman
30 Nov 24 i      `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma4Jan Panteltje
1 Dec 24 i       `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma3Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24 i        `* Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma2Jan Panteltje
1 Dec 24 i         `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1Bill Sloman
29 Nov 24 `- Re: New fusion power system test creates 300,000 degrees C plasma1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal