Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems
De : '''newspam''' (at) *nospam* nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 30. Nov 2024, 18:40:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vifilu$1s1cd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 30/11/2024 15:51, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 10:50:07 +0000, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
 
On 26/11/2024 03:15, john larkin wrote:
>
Having electricity used to be normal.
>
UK power supply is generally way more stable than US.
 How many hours per year is your power out?
Mine personally used to be entirely reliable after they replaced the perished 1950's rubber insulated 3 vertical strands LT with modern aluminium compound cable wiring with a steel hawser core. Prior to that the lights would flicker in storms and burning bits of rubber would fall to the ground under mostly bare copper wires as wet strips of old rubber and canvas insulation touched them with much arcing and sparking.
Apart from half a day a year for preventative maintenance where they cut down overhanging tree branches it was reliable in the old days. Failure is usually because someone has driven into a pole. Hazard of above ground cabling (which is unusual in the UK apart from rural backwaters).
However, since the latest shower cut back on preventative maintenance we got hammered when storm Arwen hit taking down several (rotten) poles. We were down for a couple of days but people around me were down for up to two weeks (not enough poles and/or people and kit to put them in). Their replace on fail policy can't cope with massive systemic failures. Same with a couple of inches of snow and UK grinds to a standstill.
In the cities mains supplies are underground and pretty much reliable apart from that infamous incident that I referred to. However, in a cold winter on a still and cloudy day the margins now are extremely tight at a level where they have to pay some bigger industrial users not to use power.

I'd estimate two total here, on avearge, but a pole on our street
toppled down recently and that took 5 hours to replace
We had that too in my village. Once a tree fell on it and the steel hawser held it but permanently bent all the poles like bananas and the other time the milk tanker on sheet ice totalled a pole on one of the coldest days of the year (Sunday morning). Isolated random incident so the previous power distribution company had us back on by nightfall.
If that happened again today I expect we would get something like :
"Your call is really important to us ... our office hours are 9-5 please call back on Monday with you emergency power outage <naff music>".

Large-region power failures are very rare here, between major
earthquakes.
They are in the UK too. We don't have earthquakes (well we do notice the odd one every few years but they are tiny compared to real earthquakes).

The public consultation was yesterday. It really is 1GW injection power
and 4 hours so a 4GWhr battery farm (40x bigger than the largest system
currently in the UK and being built by a startup with no track record!).
>
It will have ~900 container modules of batteries as close together as
they dare (half the US regulation spacing) and in double lines of 50.
>
SO that makes me wonder how big is a 1GW transformer operating at 400kV?
And how much does one cost?
 Big utility transformers are made to order, and that can take years.
The hazards there are obvious.
That is what I thought. I'm trying to put bounds on the lead time. I'm more impressed with their sales pitch than I expected to be. My back of the envelope calculations suggest an air of unreality about their claimed/intended GW injection capacity. Availability of supergrid line is not in doubt two main corridors run close by. You can light up a fluoro tube stood on end under them. Indeed an artist did just that!
https://www.industrytap.com/florescent-bulbs-unplugged-and-shinning-tapping-electromagnetic-fields/1763

>
I'm guessing the secondary to handle 2500A will have to be (30A = 2mm^2
so 3000A ~ 200mm^2 = 16mm diameter) and at a 40:1 stepdown the low side
will have to be 40x bigger cross section 6x linear size hollow core?).
Are these guesses approximately right? How many turns on each?
>
How much soft iron core does it require (approximately)?
 It takes special gear to measure the inductance of a utility-scale
transformer. A handheld meter won't do.
Granted.

The location chosen is very cunning. They will get paid not to produce
electricity by intercepting the payments (to not produce electricity)
currently made to wind farm owners in Scotland and off the NE coast.
 Hey, I know how to not produce electricity.
You also have to possess the requisite kit to get paid for not doing it.
(UK infrastructure is a complete mess after decades of under investment)
Another question for my education approximately what is the current rating of a modern UK 400kV supergrid line (I presume limited by sagging or softening from thermal expansion). Likewise for 132kV and 33kV.
Wiki says ~2GW/circuit at 400kV (seems far too low to me)?
--
Martin Brown

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Nov 24 * 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems68Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3legg
24 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Don
24 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Jeroen Belleman
24 Nov 24 i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems39TTman
24 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems38Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems35john larkin
24 Nov 24 i i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3TTman
24 Nov 24 i ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
25 Nov 24 i ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i i+- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems30Martin Brown
26 Nov 24 i i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems29john larkin
26 Nov 24 i i  +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
26 Nov 24 i i  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6Martin Brown
27 Nov 24 i i  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5john larkin
27 Nov 24 i i  i +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Bill Sloman
27 Nov 24 i i  i i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
27 Nov 24 i i  i +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
27 Nov 24 i i  i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i  `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems21Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems7Jeroen Belleman
30 Nov 24 i i   i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Joe Gwinn
30 Nov 24 i i   i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i   i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i   i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i   +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Liz Tuddenham
30 Nov 24 i i   i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
1 Dec 24 i i   i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Jan Panteltje
30 Nov 24 i i   `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems10john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i    `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems9Martin Brown
30 Nov 24 i i     +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6john larkin
30 Nov 24 i i     i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems4Jeroen Belleman
1 Dec 24 i i     ii`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Martin Brown
1 Dec 24 i i     ii +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Ian
1 Dec 24 i i     ii `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Joe Gwinn
1 Dec 24 i i     i`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24 i i     `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Liz Tuddenham
1 Dec 24 i i      `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Don Y
24 Nov 24 i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
24 Nov 24 +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems8john larkin
24 Nov 24 i+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5TTman
24 Nov 24 ii+- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Martin Brown
24 Nov 24 ii+* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2john larkin
24 Nov 24 iii`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1TTman
25 Nov 24 ii`- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
25 Nov 24 i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Joe Gwinn
25 Nov 24 i `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1john larkin
24 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Don Y
25 Nov 24 +- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Robert Roland
30 Nov 24 `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems12Clive Arthur
30 Nov 24  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems10john larkin
30 Nov 24  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems9Clive Arthur
30 Nov 24  i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems8john larkin
1 Dec 24  i  +* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems6Clive Arthur
3 Dec 24  i  i`* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems5john larkin
3 Dec 24  i  i `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems4Bill Sloman
3 Dec 24  i  i  `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems3Liz Tuddenham
3 Dec 24  i  i   `* Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems2Bill Sloman
3 Dec 24  i  i    `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Liz Tuddenham
1 Dec 24  i  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Bill Sloman
1 Dec 24  `- Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal