Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems

On 3/12/2024 2:22 pm, john larkin wrote:

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 23:10:52 +0000, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
 

On 30/11/2024 17:32, john larkin wrote:
>
<snip>

>
Increased CO2 and a warmer climate, whatever the causes, are wonderful
for life on Earth, including human life.

 

>
Oh goody, an assertion!  Or should that be godly?  You're a theist
aren't you?

 Not a bit. That's a common amateur tactic, accuse people of being
Bible bangers or Trump lovers because you disagree with them.
 https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/goddard/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth-study-finds/
 Is that "NASA" some fringe religious cult?

Not exactly, but it was published in 2016, and may have been intended to make some religious nut feel happy. CO2 is the only nutrient plants need,and many plants adapt to high CO2 levels by having fewer stomata in their leaves, so that they lose less water getting the CO@ they can use - and water is harder to get than CO2.

  Come on, 'Kumbaya my Lord'. You know you want to.

 https://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/corn/news/timeless/images/US_Corn_Yld_Trend.png
 So many religious nuts!\

That doesn't say why corn yields have risen in the relevant periods - since 1956 there has been considerable progress in insecticides and weed killers, and nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers have become more popular.
Imagining that the data fits your argument when you haven't bothered to list all the relevant variables is a common amateur mistake.
When you get the data from climate change denial propaganda, it's more like importing somebodies else's deliberately deceptive output and passing it off as your own.
<snipped the usual abuse>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney