Sujet : Re: Francophones
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design sci.electronics.repairDate : 25. Dec 2024, 22:53:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <mgvomjddpihm11vcfaiv9o18kaah9fjom8@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 13:40:19 -0500, Ralph Mowery
<
rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <8i6omj1vidqoch9421207205iajrb0h5ue@4ax.com>,
cd@notformail.com says...
will see what I mean.
I still maintain the principal determinants of the impedance are as I
stated previously. The formulas for line impedance are shown on this
page and the aforementioned determinants are key.
https://www.everythingrf.com/rf-calculators/coaxial-cable-calculator
>
I could not get the calculator to come out for me. Getting negative
numbers and about 10 times what they should be.
There are a lot of silly equations around, that people plug into apps.
Try a wide microstrip in some online calculators. Many use the
equation that's in the old Motorola ECL book, and a wide trace reports
a negative Z.