Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Jan 2025, 11:26:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlb2cd$drn8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 02:28:08 -0500, bitrex wrote:

On 1/3/2025 11:25 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
On 4/01/2025 5:52 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 19:02:23 -0800, john larkin wrote:
>
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 19:24:31 +0800, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:
>
On 02-Jan-25 2:00 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Is what 'they' said at the outset. Now it emerges he had an ISIS
flag in his truck at the time! No wonder fewer and fewer people are
trusting the legacy media. This is why it's so important to have
citizen journalists mobilised and fact-checking what's really going
on when these incidents occur. I don't suppose the rather
embarrassing presence of the flag would have been revealed
otherwise.
>
For years the conspiracy theorists were telling us that governments
wereat
using the threat of terrorism to take away our freedoms.
>
Now the conspiracy theory is that governments are hiding the
existence of terrorism from us.
>
So which is it?
>
Sylvia.
>
There is no single Ministey Of Conspiracy Theory. There's diversity
in the lunatic fringe world.
>
Obama's birth certificate springs to mind here. There are equal
numbers of people calling it out as a fake as there are calling these
same people conspiracy nuts and lunatics.
 
It's a lunatic fringe.
 
 
 >
I'm almost nostalgic for the days when birther-ism was the margin of the
lunatic fringe, the lunatic fringe has way more nonsensical nonsense to
focus on these days..

Yes, like cramming in as many terrorist mass-murderers as possible before
Jan 20th.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jan 25 * OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"62Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Carlos E.R.
2 Jan 25 +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"56Sylvia Else
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"44Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"43bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"40john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"34bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"31john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"30bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"29john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"24bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"22john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"13bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"12john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"8bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
8 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
3 Jan 25 ii`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
3 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"5Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii   `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii    `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
4 Jan 25 i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
3 Jan 25  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal